Yezur Wiki:Daily routine/Report

Working report of the Alompan daily routine (how it works). Every finding lives as one row below until it is resolved: set a row's Status to give a verdict, and the next run carries it out and clears the row. Nothing on the wiki is changed except what is explicitly approved or amended.

The possible statuses:

• pending — awaiting review; no action is taken (the default)
• approved or accepted — carry out the Suggested fix, as written
• amended — carry out the fix described in Notes instead
• deferred — real, but not now; moves to Dismissed flags and is not re-flagged
• rejected — not an issue; moves to Dismissed flags and is not re-flagged
• to to-do — real issue that should be marked on User talk:Yezur's to-do list instead for human intervention
• fixed — real issue, but was a simple fix for Yezur, or has by other means already been taken care of; confirm and clear

To revive a dismissed flag, move it back into the table as pending.

Flagged items

#	Flagged	Type	Severity	Page(s)	Issue	Suggested fix	Status	Notes
72	2026-08-04	structural	medium	270 Dictionary: entries (Proto-Unterian)	Every Proto-Unterian entry states where it came from in prose, and not one of them says so to Lexemes. The 270 entries written this window each carry an ===Etymology=== section naming their source — 257 of the form "From Proto-Andusian {{m|YCP-XX|…}}" and 13 of the form "A Proto-Andusian-age formation, X + Y, continued only in Unterian". None passes etym_type or etym_source to its {{head}} call, so all 270 rows reach the Lexemes table with both fields empty. Yezur Wiki:Conventions gives that table one job — "cognate sets, borrowing chains, … one query each" — and the query it exists for, every Proto-Unterian word inherited from Proto-Andusian, currently returns nothing, on a language where the answer is 270. Ancient Hertic is the comparison: 209 of its 212 rows carry both fields, and the three that do not carry {{etym-missing}} instead and sit correctly in Category:Ancient Hertic entries needing etymology — that language files its filiation, this one does not. The other four languages with entries are root protos or single lemmas, so Proto-Unterian is the wiki's only descendant language whose descent is unrecorded in structured data.	Mechanical, and asserts nothing the entries do not already say. Add |etym_type=inherited|etym_source=YCP-XX to the {{head}} call of the 257 entries whose etymology reads "From Proto-Andusian …", and |etym_type=compound|etym_source=YCP-XX to the 13 formations — the same two values already in use in the table (inherited 209, compound 1). The source is read from each page's own etymology line, not inferred, and no definition, gloss or heading changes. One pass; the routine can do it the day it is approved.	pending	New 2026-08-04, from the Lexemes check. Not a criticism of the entries: the prose etymologies are complete and consistent, and this is only the machine-readable half of what they already say. Recorded as not a finding beside it: the 273 Proto-Andusian, 211 Proto-Herta-Olaic and 102 Proto-Njeshan rows also carry no etymology, and are right not to — they are the reconstructed roots of their families and have no source on the wiki to name. The three Andusian branch protos registered this window (YCP-XA, YCP-XB) have no entries yet; when they do, they will be the same case as this row. Update 2026-08-06: the scope has grown as this row predicted. Proto-North-Andusian (269 rows), Proto-South-Andusian (269) and Besoh (280) were all seeded in the following window, all three state descent in prose, and all three file etym_type on nothing. The row now covers 1,088 lemma rows across four languages, not 270 across one — 1,044 inherited and 44 compound by their own etymology lines. Besoh's 648 non-lemma form entries are excluded: they are inflections and correctly carry no etymology. Update 2026-08-07: 1,140 lemma rows now, up from 1,088 — Besoh grew from 280 lemmas to 332 in one morning, and still files etym_type on nothing. Two corrections to this row's own figures, both from reading each entry's section rather than its page (a tooling fault described in the run notes): the shapes are 1,050 inherited and 82 language-internal formations, not 1,044 and 44 — Besoh compounds more than the count allowed for. And etym_source is not one constant: the 37 branch-proto formations are Proto-Andusian-age and take YCP-XX, while Besoh's 45 are Besoh-internal and take YCQ-BE. Eight Besoh lemmas fit neither value — two "Origin uncertain", three doublets or lengthenings split off to escape a homophone, three internal grammaticalizations — so the mechanical pass now covers 1,132 of 1,140 and the last eight want a judgment. Proto-Andusian is still correctly excluded: 238 of its 273 lemmas carry no etymology section, because it is the root.
73	2026-08-04	structural	low	Yezur Wiki:Maps	The one page in the project namespace that is not a project page. Asked to check whether every Yezur Wiki: page belongs there (see #47, dismissed), the routine read all six. Five are policy or project documentation and sit correctly: Yezur Wiki:Conventions, Yezur Wiki:Daily routine and its Report, Yezur Wiki:Dictionary structure, and Yezur Wiki:Main Page. The sixth, Yezur Wiki:Maps, is a software smoke-test for the YezurMaps extension: it opens "YezurMaps extension test" and "If you can read this but see no maps below, the module didn't attach — check Special:Version lists 'YezurMaps'", then runs four {{#map:}} calls to prove the parser function fires, that both tile backends are reachable, and that Overpass geometry loads. It addresses the reader directly throughout ("Replace 42 with a REAL relation ID from your data", "a route you've actually mapped") and its content is placeholder test data — First test province, Test marker with popup, relation ids 42 and 148–150. It is also the only page in the namespace that is uncategorised and the only one that nothing on the wiki links to.	flag-only. Where a live extension test belongs is a decision the convention set reserves to the operator, and it is the concrete case #47 was really about: if Meta: is to hold anything, this page is the readiest candidate, and moving it would give that namespace its first page and the sidebar's Project docs link somewhere to lead. Three answers are all defensible — move it to Meta:, leave it where it is and categorise it, or delete it now that the extension is known to work. The routine holds the move right and can carry out whichever is chosen.	pending	New 2026-08-04, and the direct product of #47(amended), which asked exactly this question. Recorded as not a finding: Yezur Wiki:Main Page is uncategorised too, but that is #14 (deferred), which covers the portal front pages as a class.
74	2026-08-04	naming	low	Template:Infobox polity, Yezur Wiki:Conventions	The house word was settled this run, and the one template that uses the other word is the one nothing uses. Carrying out #51 recorded the operator's ruling that country is the house word in preference to polity, and rewrote both worked examples on Yezur Wiki:Conventions to read "Countries in Andusia". Template:Infobox polity is now the only place on the wiki still carrying the retired word — and it is one of the three entries on Special:UnusedTemplates, transcluded by no page at all. Category:Countries holds one member (Engil) and already uses the settled word; Template:Infobox former country and Category:Former countries already agree with it too. The Polities Cargo table the template once declared no longer exists — it was removed with the rest of the encyclopedia's Cargo (see #43, dismissed) — so no data anywhere is keyed to the name.	Cheap, and cheapest now: rename Template:Infobox polity to Template:Infobox country, leaving a redirect, and update the one word in its documentation. Nothing transcludes it, so nothing can break, and the routine holds the move right. The alternative is equally clean: say that polity is wanted as a distinct term — a living state as against a country in the broader sense — in which case the template is correctly named and the row closes with a sentence on Yezur Wiki:Conventions saying so. What is not wanted is the present state, where the convention page names one word and the only template on the subject names the other.	pending	New 2026-08-04, and the residue of an operator ruling rather than a fresh defect. The ruling settled the worked examples, which is what #51 asked; this is the consequence it left behind. #43 (rejected) is not re-opened — that row was about the Cargo table, which is gone; this is about the name on the template.
75	2026-08-04	structural	low	Herta-Olaic, Njeshan, Tacchoan, List of languages	Two hand-maintained lists now write the same twelve names two different ways, because two verdicts said so. #67 was approved as written, and its fix says the missing Members rows go in "as plain text where no article exists … so no red link is created". #71 was amended in the same triage, and its note says the opposite for the roster — "red-link the rest: link all twelve roster entries". Both were carried out this run, exactly as instructed. The result is that Airananwe, Anilonic, Senitian, Usinger, Esselitian, High Gaillean, Kankai, Middle Airananwe, Old Ousperian, Old Usinger, Skennic and Terjiquan are blue-linked on List of languages and plain text in the Members table of the family article that lists them. Every other name in those same tables is linked. The two lists agree perfectly on membership — the check confirms 6/6, 8/8 and 7/7 against the roster — and disagree only on this.	Mechanical either way, and one pass. (a) Link them in the Members tables too, in the [[X language|X]] form the roster now uses — matching every other row of those tables and making the two lists identical in form as well as content. This adds no new red-link targets: all twelve are already wanted from the roster. (b) Or unlink them on the roster, if the red links there were meant to be temporary. (a) is the reading that follows from #71, which is the later verdict.	pending	New 2026-08-04. Filed rather than assumed: both instructions were explicit and scoped to different pages, so the routine carried out each as given rather than harmonising them on its own. Not the same as #57 (deferred), which is about whether the four Tacchoan branch names get articles — these twelve are languages, and the roster already treats them as wanted.
76	2026-08-04	factual	low	Dictionary:kidz, Dictionary:kizi, Dictionary:oʊmjiəɲɔ	Three entries call the peoples of Yezur human, and nothing on the wiki says whether that is the word. The three are the only in-frame uses of human anywhere on the wiki, checked across all 1,264 pages: "# person, human being" on the Proto-Andusian entry and on its Proto-Unterian descendant, and "# a human being, someone; one of us as against a beast" on the Proto-Herta-Olaic one. Every other occurrence of the word on the wiki is out-of-frame, describing the human editor. The three are consistent with each other and read naturally; the question is only whether the encyclopedia's own voice uses human for Yezuri people, which touches Yezur Wiki:Conventions §The Earth test — the same section that rules on "Yezuri" as a reflexive qualifier — and would settle how every future entry glossing person is written.	flag-only. A canon question, not a maintenance one: the routine will not choose a word for the peoples of the world. Say whether human is in-frame vocabulary. If it is, the row closes and nothing changes. If it is not, the fix is three definition lines and the routine can make it in one pass.	pending	New 2026-08-04 as a row, though not a new observation: it was recorded inside #62's notes on 2026-07-30, when there was one such entry. That row was cleared this run, so the question would otherwise have gone with it; it is filed here so it has a home of its own. It has also grown from one entry to three, all three by inheritance from the same gloss. Update 2026-08-06: grown again, from 3 pages to 5 — 6 uses in all, still the only in-frame uses of the word on the wiki, now across all 2,419 pages. The additions are Dictionary:kij (Besoh) and the Proto-South-Andusian section of Dictionary:kidz, both inheriting the same gloss from the same Proto-Andusian entry. Every new descendant language will inherit it again. Update 2026-08-07: 7 uses on 5 pages, and the seventh is a new shape. The other six all gloss person as "person, human being", inherited from one Proto-Andusian entry. The new one is on Dictionary:o' — "claw, talon (of beasts) — the human nail is kio'" — where the word is not a gloss at all but does taxonomic work in a definition, dividing the peoples of Yezur from the beasts. That is a larger claim than the other six make, and it arrived in the same edit as #86.
77	2026-08-04	structural	low	Dictionary:About Besoh, Dictionary:About Proto-Andusian, Dictionary:About Proto-North-Andusian, Dictionary:About Proto-South-Andusian, Dictionary:About Proto-Unterian	The Dictionary has grown a class of appendix page and no category for it. Five Dictionary:About … pages now document a language apiece, four of them a proto-language — its conventions, phonology, sound laws from its parent, derivation and reduplication. They are the only Dictionary pages that are not entries, they are written to a common shape, they cross-link one another, and all five are uncategorised: they are five of the eight entries on Special:UncategorizedPages. No category on the wiki fits them — Category:Dictionary maintenance is for review queues and is hidden, and the {{head}}-emitted lemma categories only apply to entries. More will follow: three further proto-languages are registered in Module:Languages and two of them have no About page yet.	One category, then four one-line edits — but the name and placement are the operator's call, as Yezur Wiki:Conventions reserves new categories. The shape is plain: a category for Dictionary pages that describe a language rather than a word, parented to Category:Languages or to a Dictionary branch of it. Once named, the routine can create it and file the four.	pending	New 2026-08-04. Distinct from #14 (deferred), which covers the three portal front pages and the root Category:Yezur — the other three names on the same list. Recorded as not a finding: these four pages are also on Special:LonelyPages and Special:DeadEndPages by the same measure as every Dictionary entry. Update 2026-08-06: a fifth page joined the class, Dictionary:About Besoh, and it is the first that documents an attested language rather than a proto — so the category's name should not assume proto. All five remain uncategorised, and they are five of the eight entries on Special:UncategorizedPages.
78	2026-08-04	structural	low	File:Tacchoan-subfamilies.png, Tacchoan	The file's description is the article's caption, copied, and the caption has just changed. File:Tacchoan-subfamilies.png's description page was the Tacchoan §Members caption word for word. Carrying out #55(a) rewrote that caption this run — it now describes what the map shows and names Herta-Olaic as the neighbouring family rather than a branch — while the description page still carries the old wording, because nothing keeps the two in step. #54 asked three questions about file description pages; the operator answered two of them (files are categorised; a source line where one is needed), and this is the third, left open: whether a description page may restate an article caption or should point at it. The wiki has one file today, so the answer costs one edit; #53 (deferred) means a corrected export is coming, which will make it two.	Mechanical once decided, and the decision is small. (a) Point rather than restate: the description page says what the file is and where it is used, and leaves the colour key to the article. (b) Or restate, and accept that the two are kept in step by hand — in which case the routine can copy the new caption across now and check the pair on every run. Either way the file's categories, added this run, stay as they are.	pending	New 2026-08-04. Not a re-opening of #54, which was carried out as amended and cleared: this is the one question the amendment did not reach, filed so it is not lost. Not a re-opening of #53 either — that row is about the image itself, this is about the page describing it.
79	2026-08-06	markup	medium	Dictionary:About Besoh	One bullet on the new appendix page is broken in the reader's face and wrong about the Dictionary. The §Entry conventions bullet reads: "Nouns carry a Declension section ({{tl|YCQ-BE-decl}}), verbs a Conjugation section ({{tl|YCQ-BE-conj}}). The bare plural of a noun has its own entry (a non-lemma form, without etymology); other table forms do not." Two things are wrong with it. (a) {{tl}} — the template-link helper — does not exist on this wiki. Both calls therefore render as the same red link, Template:Tl, so the sentence reads "Nouns carry a Declension section (Template:Tl), verbs a Conjugation section (Template:Tl)" and names neither table. It is the page's only red link, and the only wanted template outside the four Ancient Hertic paradigms of deferred #21. (b) The claim about entries is no longer true. The Dictionary holds 648 Besoh non-lemma entries in six shapes, not one: 125 Plural of, 130 Dative singular of, 127 Dative plural of, 125 Locative singular of, 68 Locative plural of and 66 Stative of. The bullet was written at 08:18; the first inflected-form entries followed eleven minutes later and the last at 10:17. The page was edited again at 14:31 — the window's final edit — but that edit added the grammar and word-formation sections and left this bullet as it stood.	One edit carries both. (a) Drop the helper and name the tables in plain italics or <code> — which is also what the other four Dictionary:About … pages do, none of which names a template at all. Creating Template:Tl would fix the red link but leave an in-frame page pointing at the wiki's own machinery, which is the deeper half of (a). (b) Replace "The bare plural of a noun has its own entry … ; other table forms do not" with the six shapes actually in use — plural, dative singular, dative plural, locative singular, locative plural, and the verbal stative — or with a general clause ("single-word inflected forms have their own entries; periphrastic forms do not"), which matches Module:Besoh's own linking rule and will not go stale the next time a form is added.	pending	New 2026-08-06. Filed as one row on purpose: (a) and (b) are in the same bullet, and two verdicts scoped to one sentence is exactly how #75 happened. Both halves are mechanical and neither asserts anything the wiki does not already say — the six form shapes were counted from the entries themselves, and the linking rule from the module's own edit summary. Not a criticism of the page otherwise: its five sound laws, ten spoken developments, orthography and grammar all check out against the entries and against Module:Auphen/YCQ-BE. Update 2026-08-07: unchanged, and now measurably more wrong. Dictionary:About Besoh was edited three times this window (07:25, 08:01, 10:05), each time adding grammar, and neither half of this bullet was touched. (a) {{tl}} still does not exist and still collapses both calls to the same red link. (b) the entry claim is now false of 797 non-lemma entries in the same six shapes — 159 plural, 159 dative singular, 159 locative singular, 157 dative plural, 156 locative plural, 85 stative.
80	2026-08-06	naming	medium	Dictionary:About Besoh	An in-frame page uses the one word the convention set names as forbidden. Yezur Wiki:Conventions §No real-world references says it outright — writing systems are not to be invoked by their real-world names, "no 'Latin script', no 'Romanized'". The first bullet of §Entry conventions uses the word twice: "Entries currently live at romanized titles" and "entries will move to native-script titles with romanized redirects". Checked across all 2,419 pages, these are the only two in-frame uses of it on the wiki. The three others are all out-of-frame and all permitted: Yezur Wiki:Conventions naming the ban, Yezur Wiki:Dictionary structure describing the same practice, and a comment inside Module:Auphen/YCQ-BE. The same bullet also says the move will happen "once its type is prepared for the wiki" — the encyclopedia describing its own production rather than its subject.	(a) Reword, in place. The wiki has no house term for the script it currently writes Yezuri languages in, so the minimal fix avoids naming one: "Entries currently live at transliterated titles" … "entries will move to native-script titles, with the transliterated forms kept as redirects", and "once type for it exists" for the clause about the script. (b) Or settle the house word first, and apply it to both this page and Yezur Wiki:Dictionary structure, which describes the same practice in the same borrowed word — out-of-frame and so permitted, but it is where the term entered. A single word, chosen once, closes both.	pending	New 2026-08-06. The strictest rule in the set, and the only one the convention page enforces by naming the offending word, which is what makes this checkable rather than a matter of taste. Not re-opening #12 (rejected), which settled that Greek-style native names are deliberate in-world orthography: that row is about what the scripts look like, this is about the word used to describe writing one script in another. Update 2026-08-07: unchanged. The page took three edits this window without the bullet changing, and romanized remains the only two in-frame uses of the word on the wiki, now measured across all 2,622 pages.
81	2026-08-06	maintenance	low	50 Dictionary: entries (Besoh plural forms)	Fifty more pages joined the deletion queue, which now stands at 92. A ruling this window merged word-final e and o into the plural suffix -u, so the twenty-five bare-plural entries written earlier in the day at -o'u / -e'u titles, and their twenty-five dative-plural companions, were superseded within hours of being created. Each carries {{delete|Superseded — the plural of X is now Y (pluralization rule change, operator ruling)}}. The replacements all exist — checked one by one, all twenty-five -u entries are present — and nothing links to the old pages: all fifty are on Special:LonelyPages, so no table, entry or list points at a title that is about to disappear. The queue is now: 5 talk pages (#58, deferred), 37 Proto-Andusian entries at implosive titles (#70, deferred), and these 50. The titles, unlinked so this page adds no incoming link to a page queued for removal: bazo'u, bazo'ubi, ce'u, ce'ubi, cuzze'u, cuzze'ubi, debe'u, debe'ubi, gisbo'u, gisbo'ubi, gośme'u, gośme'ubi, ho'u, ho'ubi, hoffo'u, hoffo'ubi, humme'u, humme'ubi, izvo'u, izvo'ubi, konso'u, konso'ubi, kotme'u, kotme'ubi, makvo'u, makvo'ubi, medo'u, medo'ubi, mukko'u, mukko'ubi, raco'u, raco'ubi, ruve'u, ruve'ubi, se'u, se'ubi, sevo'u, sevo'ubi, sorpe'u, sorpe'ubi, tuqme'u, tuqme'ubi, ve'u, ve'ubi, vutme'u, vutme'ubi, zebe'u, zebe'ubi, ñoro'u, ñoro'ubi.	flag-only — only an administrator can act on it. The editing bots hold no delete right, so this row exists to put the fifty in front of the one account that can remove them, and to be dismissed the way #58 and #70 were, so later runs list them under Deletion queue without re-flagging. Nothing else is wanted: the tags are correct, the reasons are stated, the replacements are in place.	pending	New 2026-08-06. Recorded as not a finding beside it: the reasons say "operator ruling", which names the wiki's process inside an in-character namespace — but Template:Delete's own documentation declares the tag "out of the in-universe frame; exempt from the Watsonian rules", so the wording is within its own licence and is not flagged. Also not a finding: all fifty were created and superseded inside the same window, which is churn rather than error — the rule changed after the batch, and the batch was corrected the same day. Update 2026-08-07: the queue is 94, the two additions being Dictionary:kunke and Dictionary:kunkeva, superseded by the kunke → kiunke respelling and correctly tagged. But two of the fifty must not be deleted — see #82. Under the new pluralization rule the titles ho'u and ho'ubi are the live plural and dative plural of Dictionary:ho', a different lemma whose declension table links to them; clearing the queue as this row lists it would red-link that table. Of the 94 pages queued, exactly three have any incoming link at all: those two, and the kunke of #84.
82	2026-08-07	structural	high	Dictionary: entries ho'u and ho'ubi (titles unlinked, see below), Dictionary:ho'	Two of the fifty pages queued for deletion are the live plural and dative plural of a different word. The pluralization ruling of 2026-08-06 moved the plural of Dictionary:ho (ho, “egg”; “stone”) from ho'u to hu, and the two superseded titles were blanked and tagged — correctly, for ho. But Dictionary:ho' is a separate lemma (ho', “guts, entrails”), it ends in a glottal and not a vowel, and Module:Besoh's rule (-u after a consonant) therefore gives it the plural ho'u and the dative plural ho'ubi — the same two titles. Its {{YCQ-BE-decl}} table links to both, and they are the only two incoming links either page has: of the 94 pages in Category:Pages flagged for deletion, exactly these two and one other (#84) are not on Special:LonelyPages. So the two pages now (a) carry a deletion banner in the reader's face where the plural of ho' belongs, (b) state a reason — "the plural of ho is now hu" — that is false of the lemma that actually points at them, and (c) will red-link a live inflection table the moment the queue is cleared. Checked against every Besoh lemma: 159 nouns and 85 verbs, 244 lemmas and 875 inflected forms — these are the only two collisions on the wiki, and apart from them not one live Besoh form is missing a page.	Mechanical, and it should be done before the queue is cleared. Rewrite the two pages as ordinary ho' non-lemma entries in the standard shape — {{head|YCQ-BE|noun form|head=ho'u}} and a definition line "Plural of ho'" / "Dative plural of …", matching the 795 other form entries — which removes the {{delete}} tag as a side effect and leaves nothing for an administrator to do. The old ho sense is already served by hu and hubi, both written and correct, so nothing is lost. What must not happen is the deletion going ahead as #81 lists it: that removes two pages a live table depends on.	pending	New 2026-08-07. The one row this run that blocks another: #81 puts all 50 superseded plurals in front of the administrator, and 48 of them are safe. These two are not, and the reason is a homograph the rule change could not have anticipated — ho and ho' are different words that the old rule sent to the same plural and the new rule separates. Verified rather than reasoned: the rule was read out of Module:Besoh itself, the incoming links from Special:WhatLinksHere, and the replacement forms confirmed present. The two titles are written unlinked here, as in #81, so this page adds no incoming link to a page queued for removal.
83	2026-08-07	structural	medium	Dictionary:gia, Dictionary:go	Two senses ruled for Besoh were written into the Proto-South-Andusian section instead. Both entries were edited this window to add a sense, and on both the new line landed one section too high. On Dictionary:gia the ==Proto-South-Andusian== section ends "# {{lb|YCQ-BE|by extension}} mighty, strong" — a Besoh label inside a section whose own {{head}} is YCP-XB — while the Besoh section above it, which the edit summary names ("By-extension sense: mighty"), does not carry the sense at all. On Dictionary:go the same section ends "# {{lb|YCQ-BE|archaic}} ten — the numeral sense has passed to {{l|YCQ-BE|göj}}", so a proto entry is labelled Besoh, cross-refers a Besoh word, and reports a Besoh sound change; the identical line is also present in the Besoh section, where it belongs. Checked across all 2,622 pages: these are the only two {{lb}} calls on the wiki whose language code does not match the L2 section containing them, and the only definition line that points at another language with {{l}}. Every {{head}} call on the wiki matches its section.	One edit each, and neither invents a sense. On Dictionary:gia: move the line down into the Besoh section, where the ruling put it — "# {{lb|YCQ-BE|by extension}} mighty, strong" after burdensome. On Dictionary:go: delete the duplicated line from the Proto-South-Andusian section, since the Besoh section already carries it word for word. If instead the proto is meant to have the sense too, the fix is the same edit with YCP-XB in the label and the Besoh cross-reference dropped — but that is a claim about Proto-South-Andusian, and the routine will not make it.	pending	New 2026-08-07. A side effect worth naming: this run's one new wanted category, Category:Besoh archaic terms (written unlinked: it is wanted, not created), is emitted from Dictionary:go — the page is its only member, and one of its two {{lb}} calls is the misplaced line. The category is real either way (the Besoh section earns it), so it stays under to-do #18 and is not flagged separately.
84	2026-08-07	structural	medium	Dictionary:kuŋke, Dictionary:mum, Dictionary:hɔ, Dictionary:kɛ	Four Descendants lists no longer describe their descendants. Every etymology's {{m}} reference to a parent language was matched against the parent entry's Descendants list, both directions, over 1,081 references: five fail, on four pages, and all five are residue of this window's rulings. Two are stale after a relocation: Dictionary:kuŋke (Proto-South-Andusian, fly) still lists a Besoh descendant kunke, a page blanked and queued for deletion this window in favour of Dictionary:kiunke; and Dictionary:mum's Proto-South-Andusian Etymology 2 (hail) still lists Besoh mum, but Besoh mum was narrowed to scratch alone the same day and the hail word is now Dictionary:mium, which names mum as its parent and gets no answer. Three are simply absent: Dictionary:hɔ (stone) lists ho but not the new hoĥ; Dictionary:kɛ's Etymology 2 (come) lists ke but not the new keś; and the third is #85, filed separately because its fix is a different edit. Each of the three new Besoh words states its parent in prose and the parent does not answer.	Four one-line edits, each read off the descendant's own etymology. On Dictionary:kuŋke, change the descendant to {{desc|YCQ-BE|kiunke}}. On Dictionary:mum, change the hail section's descendant to {{desc|YCQ-BE|mium}} (the scratch section's descendant is correct and stays). On Dictionary:hɔ, add * {{desc|YCQ-BE|hoĥ}} beside ho. On Dictionary:kɛ, add * {{desc|YCQ-BE|keś}} beside ke under Etymology 2. Nothing new is asserted: each descendant already names that parent, in that sense, on its own page.	pending	New 2026-08-07. The first back-link failures the wiki has had: the same check ran clean over 1,114 references last run, and over 1,081 this run it finds five — all of them created in the last fourteen hours, and four of the five by a homograph being moved to a new spelling. Recorded as not a finding beside it: Dictionary:oŋ was checked for the same residue after the rope homograph moved to Dictionary:one, and it is correct — its Besoh descendant is the locative particle, which stayed put.
85	2026-08-07	factual	medium	Dictionary:heĥ, Dictionary:he	A new entry claims descent from a word that does not have the meaning it claims. Dictionary:heĥ (Besoh, sharp, written this window) opens "From Proto-South-Andusian {{m|YCP-XB|hɛ}}, from Proto-Andusian {{m|YCP-XX|dʰex}} (“sharp”)". The chain does not hold at its middle link. Dictionary:hɛ's Proto-South-Andusian section carries two etymologies, all and he (the pronoun) — neither is sharp, and neither comes from dʰex. Dictionary:dʰex itself names its own South Andusian reflex, and it is he, not hɛ; Dictionary:he's Proto-South-Andusian section is exactly "From Proto-Andusian dʰex (“sharp”) — sharp, pointed; keen-edged; keen-witted", and its Descendants list names Besoh he. So the parent Dictionary:heĥ wants exists, is one letter away, and is already written.	Two edits, both read off pages that already exist. Change Dictionary:heĥ's etymology to name {{m|YCP-XB|he}} in place of {{m|YCP-XB|hɛ}} — the rest of the line, including the Proto-Andusian source and the note on the archaically restored final consonant, is already right — and add * {{desc|YCQ-BE|heĥ}} to Dictionary:he's Proto-South-Andusian Descendants, beside the existing Besoh he. Both then agree with Dictionary:dʰex, which is the entry that settles it.	pending	New 2026-08-07. Filed apart from #84 although the check found it in the same pass: the other four are links that point at the wrong page or at no page, and this one is a statement of descent that is wrong — a different edit and, if the operator disagrees with the reading, a different verdict. Not a criticism of the coinage: heĥ beside he is exactly the archaic-restoration pattern the entry describes, and the sibling coinage Dictionary:hoĥ gets the identical pattern right (its parent Dictionary:hɔ does carry stone), which is what makes this look like a slip rather than a decision.
86	2026-08-07	structural	low	Dictionary:o', Dictionary:kio'	An entry was narrowed and its structured gloss was not, so two Besoh nouns now file the same meaning and one of them denies it. Dictionary:o' was edited this window to narrow it to beast-claws — its definition now reads "claw, talon (of beasts) — the human nail is {{l|YCQ-BE|kio'}}" (the human in it is the new use counted under #76) — but its {{head}} call still says gloss=fingernail, and that is what reaches Lexemes. Dictionary:kio', the word the definition hands the sense to, files gloss=fingernail as well. The table therefore holds two Besoh nouns glossed fingernail, one of which says in its own definition line that it is not one. Checked wiki-wide, this is the only lemma on the wiki whose head gloss appears in no definition line of its own section and where the two genuinely disagree: the other 25 the check raised are all the Proto-Herta-Olaic and Proto-Njeshan style where the gloss is a keyword and the definition is a description of it (fingernail → "nail, claw; the hard growth at a digit's end"), which is house practice and not drift.	One parameter. Change Dictionary:o''s head to gloss=claw, matching its own first definition line and the word it is now contrasted with. Nothing else on either page changes, and Dictionary:kio' is already right.	pending	New 2026-08-07. A near-miss recorded rather than flagged: Dictionary:go is the same shape — its primary sense moved to "whole, full; the complete count" and its head still says gloss=ten — but ten does survive there as a labelled archaic sense, so the gloss is stale rather than contradicted, and the page has a live verdict pending against it already (#83). If #86 is approved and the operator wants the same done to Dictionary:go, say so in Notes and both go in one pass.
87	2026-08-07	structural	low	12 Dictionary: affix entries (Proto-Andusian)	The Proto-Andusian affixes promise thirty-six branch descendants and not one of them arrives. The twelve affix entries — -dzi, -gɛ, -kɛ, -me, -oŋ, -so, -uɣ, -wa, -ɛts, -ᵐbu, sog-, ᵐbi- — each carry a Descendants list naming their North Andusian, South Andusian and Unterian reflexes. All 36 pointers resolve to nothing, and they fail in two different ways. Twelve are ordinary red links, at eleven distinct titles (-ets, -ge, -mu, -oŋi, -u, -uɣi, -zi, -õ, -ɛsi, so-, mi- — -mu is wanted twice, by both the South Andusian and the Unterian reflex of -ᵐbu), which Special:WantedPages reports and which are 11 of the 60 names on it. The other twenty-four are worse than red: where the reflex is spelled the same as the ancestor (-me, -so, -wa and six more), the link is blue — it lands on the affix page the reader is already on, at a section anchor that does not exist there. Nothing reports those: not Special:WantedPages, not Special:BrokenRedirects, not the linter. The three branch protos are otherwise complete, at 269, 269 and 270 lemmas apiece, so this is the one part of the family's vocabulary the seeding did not reach.	flag-only. Writing 36 affix entries is lexicographic work, not maintenance, and the routine will not invent morphology. Two smaller answers are also open if the entries are not wanted soon: the 24 same-spelling pointers could be plain italics rather than {{desc}} links until the sections exist, which costs one edit per affix page and stops the reader being sent in a circle; or they can stand as a standing wanted-list, which is what they are today.	pending	New 2026-08-07. Not a re-opening of the wanted-pages pattern the last run recorded as self-resolving — that reading was right, and it is why wanted pages fell from 319 to 92 to 60 as the languages were seeded. This row is the remainder after that fall: the affixes are what is left, and the twenty-four blue-but-dead pointers are the half of it no maintenance page can see. The count was taken by resolving every {{desc}} call on the wiki — 1,140 of them — against the Lexemes table.
88	2026-08-08	factual	medium	Dictionary:saźgob, Dictionary:mamgob, Dictionary:mamgo'	A Besoh compound is derived from a Besoh word that does not exist. Dictionary:saźgob (wool) gives its etymology as From {{m|YCQ-BE|saś}} (“beast”) + a clipping of {{m|YCQ-BE|mamgob}} (“mane”), with voicing at the seam. The first element holds — Dictionary:saś is Besoh for animal. The second names a Besoh mamgob, and there is no such word. Dictionary:mamgob carries a Proto-Andusian section and a Proto-North-Andusian one and nothing else, so the reference is a blue link that lands the reader in Proto-Andusian, and Lexemes holds no Besoh row for it. The Besoh reflex of that root is written and is one page away: Dictionary:mamgoʔ (Proto-South-Andusian) names its descendant as mamgo', Dictionary:mamgo' exists, and its third sense is mane — the very gloss this etymology quotes. This is the same failure as the second half of #87, a blue link to a section that is not on the page it reaches, and it is the only instance of it anywhere outside those twelve affix entries. All 4,082 {{l}}, {{m}} and {{desc}} calls on the wiki were resolved against the sections that actually exist: 47 fail, of which 37 are #87 and #84, 8 are placeholders in template and project documentation, and the remaining two are this row and #89.	The reference is certainly wrong, and the replacement is already on the wiki — {{m|YCQ-BE|mamgo'}}. The shape does not follow it, which is why the rest is flag-only. Besoh mamgo' ends in a glottal, and the clipping inside saźgob ends in -gob, the ancestral shape. Three readings fit. (a) The compound predates the change of *b to *ʔ, and the etymology should say so, citing the Proto-South-Andusian Dictionary:mamgoʔ. (b) The compound is Besoh-internal and the headword should be saźgo' to match — which moves six pages, the lemma and its five inflected forms, and touches Dictionary:sagobbe' with them. (c) gob survives beside the free mamgo' as a bound element, and the etymology should name that instead — which is #89 seen from the other side. Which of the three is a question about Besoh's history, and the routine will not answer it.	pending	New 2026-08-08, on a day with no content changes at all: the entry was written on 2026-08-07 and the check that found it is new this run. Not a re-opening of #87 — that row is about affix entries promising descendants they do not have, this is a lemma etymology citing a word in the wrong language. Recorded as not a finding: the voicing at the seam the etymology describes is confirmed by Dictionary:About Besoh's own §Word formation table, which lists ś + g becoming źg with saźgob as its worked example.
89	2026-08-08	structural	medium	Dictionary:so'-, Dictionary:About Besoh, Dictionary:saźgob	Three pages use a Besoh word for hair that has no entry, and the word the Dictionary does give for hair is a different one. The element is gob. Dictionary:About Besoh uses it as a free noun in §Participles and subordinate clauses — gob hummebi keś, “makes the hair into cloth” — Dictionary:saźgob carries it as its second element, and Dictionary:so'- builds on it: privative: without the base, lacking it — a glottal-initial base coalesces at the seam (so'- + gob > {{m|YCQ-BE|soǵob}} “wool-less”). There is no Dictionary:gob and no Lexemes row for it, and the Besoh word the Dictionary gives for hair is Dictionary:mamgo'. The derived form fails too. Every other Besoh affix entry ends its definition with a linked worked example, and every one of those resolves — luqe on Dictionary:-ke, ĝamme on Dictionary:-me, korso and konso on Dictionary:-so, humva on Dictionary:-va, bi on Dictionary:bi-, three on Dictionary:bon-, ro' on Dictionary:ro-: ten examples across eight entries. soǵob is the one that does not, and it is one of only two red links in the whole Dictionary: namespace that #87 does not account for.	Two answers, and the first is the same question #88 asks. (a) Say what gob is — a free Besoh noun hair, wool beside mamgo', or a bound element surviving only in compounds — and then write it, after which soǵob can be written from it and #88’s shape problem resolves with it. (b) Or leave gob unwritten and unlink the example, in plain italics, which is how the same page cites bivus, muqso, rośen, ĝamso and keme'on — none of which has an entry, and none of which promises one, because none is a link. Flag-only on which: whether a language has a word is not a maintenance question.	pending	New 2026-08-08. Filed apart from #88 although the two turn on the same element, because the edits are on different pages and either can be carried out alone. Recorded beside it: Dictionary:so'- is also the only one of the six Besoh affixes inherited from Proto-Andusian that omits the Proto-South-Andusian step — its five siblings all name that step in plain italics, precisely because #87 means those entries do not exist to link. Dictionary:sog-'s own Descendants list gives the step as sog-, so the sentence can be completed without inventing anything, in the same edit as this row. The other unaccounted red link is Dictionary:dog, which Template:D's documentation creates with its own live worked examples; it is out-of-frame, and not filed.
90	2026-08-08	markup	medium	Dictionary:About Besoh	Two bullets swap bold for italic in the reader's face, and both lose a Besoh letter doing it. An italicised word ending in the glottal apostrophe closes with three apostrophes in a row, and on a line that also carries a bold run the parser pairs them the wrong way round. Two lines of §Participles and subordinate clauses do this. The active-participle bullet is written * '''Active participle''' in ''-so'' (the agent suffix in clausal duty): it stands before its noun and takes its own object to its left — ''korsu muqso bo''' “a man driving horses”. and renders as: Active participle' in bold, with a stray apostrophe; then the whole explanation in italics; then korsu muqso bo in bold with its final glottal eaten, so the example reads bo, a different Besoh word, in place of bo' “man”. The privative bullet does the same: Privative' in bold, the explanation italic, and sagobbe' rendered as sagobbe, which is not a word. §Orthography is a third, milder case — the glottal's own row, written '''' '''' = ʔ, renders as a loose apostrophe and a bold space. A balance check does not catch any of this: the page closes 29 <b> and 142 <i> tags cleanly. The tags are paired; they are simply around the wrong words.	Three one-line edits, and no wording changes. Use the pattern the same page already uses correctly in §Basic grammar for the negator and the perfect particle: put a space before the closing italics, ''korsu muqso bo' '', or write the apostrophe inside <nowiki> tags. Applied to the two bullets and the orthography row, the bold returns to the term being defined, the explanation returns to upright, and both Besoh examples get their glottal back.	pending	New 2026-08-08, and found by rendering rather than by reading: the wikitext looks unremarkable. Swept wiki-wide, the pattern occurs on seven pages outside this Report, and on five of them it renders as intended because no bold shares the line — Dictionary:-ke and Dictionary:-so among them, both checked and correct. It mis-renders on this page, in the two places above, and on User talk:Yezur, which is out-of-frame and not filed. Distinct from #79 — a different bullet on the same page and a different defect — but the two are one sitting.
91	2026-08-09	voice	medium	Ancient Hertic language, Hertia, Ignusia	Three articles call the eastern inland sea "Yezur's cradle of civilization", and the wiki's two other mentions of the same place do not. Yezur Wiki:Conventions sets the Earth test in as many words: "Wherever 'Yezur' or 'Yezuri' appears, the sentence should still read as a natural Wikipedia sentence with 'Earth' in its place … a reflexive 'Yezuri' in front of every other noun does not" pass. An encyclopedia of Earth writes the cradle of civilization, never Earth's, because there is only one and the possessive adds nothing. Three pages take the possessive — Ancient Hertic language ("a region often described as Yezur's cradle of civilization"), Hertia ("remembered as Yezur's cradle of civilization") and Ignusia ("The eastern sea is Yezur's cradle of civilization") — while List of languages writes "in a region often described as the cradle of civilization" and Main Page writes "along the eastern one lies the cradle of civilization". Five mentions of one place, three of them possessive and two not, so the fix is toward practice the wiki already keeps. Everything else passes. Every occurrence of Yezur and Yezuri in the 50 main-namespace pages was read against the test: "a continent in the southwest of Yezur", "the tallest mountains on Yezur", "Yezur's polar continent" and "loanwords drawn from languages across Yezur" all read naturally with Earth in place, and the last of those is the Conventions page's own worked example of a passing sentence. This construction is the only one that fails.	Three one-word edits. Replace "Yezur's cradle of civilization" with "the cradle of civilization" on Ancient Hertic language, Hertia and Ignusia. Nothing else in the three sentences changes, and no claim about the world is altered — the sea is still the cradle of civilization, and it is still the only one.	pending	New 2026-08-09, from the first wiki-wide reading of the encyclopedia against Yezur Wiki:Conventions. Earlier runs surveyed the change window, and every window since this Report began has been Dictionary work, so the 31 articles in the main namespace had never been swept as a set. Recorded and deliberately not flagged: Sihia's Yezuri Age of Exploration and Taccho's Yezuri Middle Ages carry the same reflexive prefix, but they are dismissed #8 — the operator has ruled these are not the canon names for the eras — so the routine leaves them alone rather than tidying a name that is going to change. New World, on Lovvocia and Vetsia, is already an open thread on both Talk pages ("a placeholder, awaiting a Yezuri derivation"), recorded exactly where the Conventions say an open thread belongs, and is not re-raised here.
92	2026-08-09	markup	low	Andusia, Herta-Olaic, Hertia, Njeshan, Shung-Worrehan	Ten boldface runs in the encyclopedia mark something that is not the article's subject. Yezur Wiki:Conventions on text formatting: "Boldface marks the article's subject — and its significant alternative names and redirect targets — at first mention, and almost nothing else. Do not bold terms for emphasis." Every bold run in all 31 main-namespace articles was matched against its page's title and against every redirect pointing at that page; ten fail, on five pages. Seven are branch names bolded where they are introduced — Herta-Olaic (Hertia branch, Olay branch), Njeshan (Betonia branch, northwestern branch, southwestern branch) and Shung-Worrehan (Shung branch, Worrehan branch). Two are bolded wikilinks in Andusia's subcontinent bullets, on Unteria and Betonia, where the bold adds nothing the link does not already do. One is an alternative spelling: Hertia writes [[Phose Serou]] (''Φοσε Ζερου''; also spelled '''Fose Serou'''), putting the second spelling in bold beside the native form in italics. Tacchoan is the comparison: it introduces four branches — Esselis, Rumesselis, Kipoa and Usy — in plain text, so the house form already exists on the wiki and four of five family articles simply disagree with it. And the bolding that is correct is left alone: English language bolds Traditional English and New English, and both are redirects to that page — the one case the convention names as allowed.	Five edits, no wording changed. Take the bold off the seven branch names and off the two subcontinent links, leaving the links themselves in place. On Hertia, move the alternative spelling into italics beside the native form: [[Phose Serou]] (''Φοσε Ζερου''; also spelled ''Fose Serou'').	pending	New 2026-08-09, from the same wiki-wide sweep as #91. Main Page is excluded from the count on purpose: it is a designed portal rather than an article, and its bold is layout, not prose emphasis. The 19 redirects in the namespace hold no prose and were skipped.
93	2026-08-09	structural	low	Besoh language, Lonish language, Nichana language, Pjany language, Uu language	Five of the eleven language articles cannot be reached by the name the rest of the wiki calls them. Yezur Wiki:Conventions on naming: language articles take the "X language" form, and "Native names and other aliases become redirects." Six of the eleven have the bare-name redirect — Ancient Hertic, English, Gaillean, High Nichana, Otjesi and Pises — and five do not: Besoh, Lonish, Nichana, Pjany and Uu are unclaimed titles. The split is not random. Four of the five missing ones are exactly the articles that got a native-name redirect instead — Lôniêv, Nehchánh, Peanei and Uu-Co all resolve, so each of those four received one alias and not the other. Besoh language received neither, and is the only language article on the wiki reachable by no alias at all: its native name Bëson is given in its own lead and in its infobox and has no page, and the bare title has no page. It is also the wiki's most-written language, with 332 lemmas and 797 form entries in the Dictionary.	Create six redirects, each a single line, matching the six that already exist: Besoh, Bëson, Lonish, Nichana, Pjany and Uu — titles written unlinked here so this Report does not put six fresh red links into the wanted-pages count — every one #REDIRECT [[X language]]. No article is edited and no link changes, because every article link already goes through the piped "X language" form.	pending	New 2026-08-09, from the same sweep as #91. None of the five is a red link — nothing on the wiki links a bare language name — so this repairs no broken link and costs no article edit; it is reader-facing navigation and search only, and that is why it is filed low. One judgment the routine will not make for the operator: Nichana and Pjany are plausible names for a future people or region, and Uu is short enough to want for something else. If any of the bare titles should stay free, say which, and the row narrows — Besoh and Bëson have no such competition and are the part of this fix that is unambiguous.
94	2026-08-09	structural	low	Tacchoan, Herta-Olaic	The five language-family articles are written to one shape, and two of them break it in one place each. Four of the five head their sections Branches, Members, Distribution, in that order. Tacchoan has no Branches heading at all: its four branch bullets — Esselis, Rumesselis, Kipoa, Usy, each with a sentence of range — sit under == Members == above the language table, so a reader looking for the branches finds them filed under members, and a reader looking for the members meets a branch list first. Herta-Olaic alone heads its closing section == Colonial distribution == where the other four use == Distribution ==, although all five sections do the same job and three of the other four describe colonial spread in them.	Two edits, no prose touched. On Tacchoan, rename the existing == Members == to == Branches == and insert a fresh == Members == immediately above the language table; the image stays where it is, at the head of the branch section it illustrates. On Herta-Olaic, rename == Colonial distribution == to == Distribution ==.	pending	New 2026-08-09, from the same sweep as #91. The routine takes the four-article majority as the house form rather than deciding which is better writing; if the more specific heading is the wanted one, the amendment is to rename the other four instead, and the routine will carry that out just as readily. Not flagged beside it: Andusian gives its Members section one sentence of prose where the other four use a table — that is dismissed #11 (the family has one attested member so far), and the sentence is accurate.
95	2026-08-09	structural	medium	Main Page	Half the front page's navigation leads nowhere. The Explore the world panel offers four cards of identical design — same border, same rule, same bold heading. Two carry a link: Lands and seas to Category:Continents and Tongues and families to Category:Language families. The other two, Peoples and pasts ("The nations, ages, and deeds of the world") and Life and nature ("The creatures, plants, and wild places of Yezur"), carry bold text and no link of any kind. Nothing in the design tells a reader which two are live, so the first thing a first-time visitor does on the wiki's front page has an even chance of doing nothing.	Half mechanical, half a decision. Peoples and pasts has targets already on the wiki and can be linked today: Category:History (its own description reads "former countries, periods, and events") covers the pasts half and Category:Countries the peoples half — which of the two the card should point at is the operator's pick, and the routine will wire whichever is named. Life and nature has no target: all 37 categories on the wiki were read and none covers living things or wild places. The honest options for it are to leave the card as it stands, to remove it until there is somewhere for it to lead, or to create the category first — and a new category needs the operator's say-so under Yezur Wiki:Conventions, so the routine will not invent one.	pending	New 2026-08-09, from the same sweep as #91, and the only finding in it that a reader meets before anything else. Filed medium for that reason rather than for its size. Recorded and not flagged: Main Page is also uncategorised, which is dismissed #14, covering the portal front pages as a class.
96	2026-08-09	factual	low	Alompe, Hertia	Two sentences read "the Ancient Hertic", with nothing for the article to attach to. Alompe closes "…and the Ancient Hertic was spoken there" and Hertia closes "…and the birthplace of the Ancient Hertic." In both, the word language sits inside the pipe, so what the reader sees is the article's name with its noun taken away. Herta-Olaic shows the pattern that works, twice on one page: "The Ancient Hertic language belongs to the Hertia branch" and "the Gaillean language belongs to one of these" — the noun sits outside the link and the sentence reads. Checked across all 50 main-namespace pages: these two are the only piped "X language" links preceded by a bare the with no noun after them.	Two edits, one word each, both outside the link. On Alompe: "…and the Ancient Hertic language was spoken there." On Hertia: "…and the birthplace of the Ancient Hertic language." The link target, the display text and every fact stay as they are.	pending	New 2026-08-09, from the same sweep as #91. Filed as factual rather than markup because the missing word is in the sentence, not in the wikitext: the markup is well-formed and renders exactly what it was told to render.
97	2026-08-10	structural	low	The 12 pages of the Module: namespace	The wiki's twelve modules are the only body of pages on it that no category holds. Every other namespace is filed: 28 of the 31 templates carry one of four categories (Category:Templates, Category:Dictionary templates, Category:Infobox templates, Category:Link templates), all 34 documentation pages of the Map: namespace sit in Category:Map documentation, the one file carries two, and four of the six project pages carry Category:Yezur Wiki (the two that do not are #73 and dismissed #14). The modules carry none — Module:Auphen, its three sound-data pages and Module:Auphen/frame, Module:Besoh, Module:Head, Module:Infobox, Module:Infobox/doc, Module:Labels, Module:Languages and Module:Translations, twelve for twelve. And nothing on the wiki reports it. Special:UncategorizedPages reads only the content namespaces, which here are the main one, Dictionary: and Map:; the module namespace is outside its reach, so the eight names that page lists have never included one. No category for them exists or is wanted: all 105 entries on Special:WantedCategories are per-language lemma and part-of-speech categories emitted by {{head}} and {{lb}}, and not one names a module or a template.	One category, then twelve one-line edits — but the name and placement are the operator's call, as Yezur Wiki:Conventions reserves new categories. The plain shape is a container for the wiki's Lua modules, sibling to Category:Templates under Category:Yezur; Category:Modules is the obvious name and is encyclopedia furniture of the kind §Naming already permits ("Infobox, Cite, Stub, Navbox"). Once named, the routine can create it and file all twelve in one pass.	pending	New 2026-08-10, from the first reading of the Template:, Module: and Category: namespaces as a set. Not a re-opening of #25, which the operator sent to the to-do list at User talk:Yezur and which the routine does not re-flag: that item is about seven modules whose /doc subpage does not exist, and its fix is writing documentation. This is about the category footer, and its fix is one line per page. The two do meet, and that is worth saying: on a wiki that carries module documentation, the category conventionally sits on the /doc page rather than in the module source, so if the doc pages are written first this row is carried out inside that work and costs nothing extra. If they are not, the twelve lines stand on their own.
98	2026-08-10	structural	low	Template:Translations/testcases	The count of uncategorised templates this Report prints every run is three, and only one of them can be fixed. Special:UncategorizedTemplates has read 3 for as long as this page has recorded it, and the routine has carried the figure without ever resolving it into names. The three are Template:Infobox/styles.css, Template:Translations/styles.css and Template:Translations/testcases. The first two are not defects: both are stylesheets, held in the sanitized-css content model, in which a category link is not wikitext but a syntax error — they cannot be categorised and will sit on that list permanently. The third is ordinary wikitext, and its own sibling shows what it should carry: Template:Auphen/testcases, the wiki's other live test page, ends with [[Category:Templates]].	One line. Add a category to Template:Translations/testcases. Category:Dictionary templates is the closer fit — the template it tests, Template:Translations, is filed there, while Template:Auphen/testcases follows Template:Auphen into Category:Templates — so either answer keeps a test page beside the template it tests. After it, the honest figure for uncategorised templates is 0 of 29 that can be.	pending	New 2026-08-10. Filed apart from #97 although both are furniture categorisation: this one is a single line on a single page needing no decision, and #97 cannot start until a category is named. Recorded as not a finding beside it: Template:Auphen/testcases and Template:Translations/testcases are two of the three names on Special:UnusedTemplates, which is correct — a test page is meant to be transcluded by nothing. The third is Template:Infobox polity, which is #74.
99	2026-08-10	voice	medium	Yezur Wiki:Conventions, Yezur Wiki:Main Page	The frame table does not reach the namespaces the wiki's machinery lives in, and its rule of thumb gives them an answer they cannot keep. Yezur Wiki:Conventions §Namespaces names six: (Main), Dictionary: and Map: in-character, Yezur Wiki:, Meta: and Talk: out-of-frame. Those cover 2,533 of the wiki's 2,622 pages. The remaining 89 are in Category: (37), Template: (31), Module: (12), User: (7), File: (1) and MediaWiki: (1), and the section's closing rule of thumb rules on them by omission — "everything a reader or editor sees is in-character, except the Meta:, Talk:, and Yezur Wiki: namespaces. That includes template, module, and category names" — so all 89 are in-character. Twenty of them are not, and four say so themselves. Six pages name a real-world reference work in as many words: Template:Delete ("Modelled on Wikipedia's deletion tags"), Template:L, Template:M and Template:Lb ("Wiktionary-style", "curated from Wiktionary's own label set"), Module:Labels and Module:Languages — eight occurrences in all. Eleven of the twelve modules are Lua source, and their comments necessarily name their own materials: five uses of Latin, seven of IPA, two each of Greek and ASCII, and in Module:Labels the word Earth itself, in a line explaining that everything Earth-specific was dropped from its label set. And the four that declare their own frame do it without a rule to point at: Category:Dictionary maintenance and Category:Yezur Wiki say in their visible text that they are "out-of-frame — about the wiki, not about the world", Category:Pages flagged for deletion says so in a comment, and Template:Delete goes furthest, its comment reading "out of the in-universe frame; exempt from the Watsonian rules" — an exemption the convention set does not define. The wiki's second statement of the rule disagrees with the first: Yezur Wiki:Main Page §Conventions says "world content in Main and the Dictionary (in character); project talk in Meta, Yezur Wiki, and Help, and on Talk pages (out of character)", which drops Map: from the in-character side altogether and covers none of the 89 either.	flag-only. What frame the machinery namespaces are held to is a convention decision and the routine will not make it — but it is the rule the routine needs, because it decides whether a phrase like Wiktionary-style in template documentation is a finding or house practice, and today the routine has no answer to check against. The shape of the fix is small: three or four rows added to the §Namespaces table. The distinction that already exists in practice is between the name of a template, module or category — which §Naming governs, and which every one of the 89 keeps — and its documentation or description, which is editor-facing and where all twenty exceptions sit. If that is the intended line, saying so in the table closes the row, legitimises the four self-declarations, and lets Template:Delete's comment cite a policy instead of asserting one. The second statement on Yezur Wiki:Main Page should be brought into step with whatever is decided.	pending	New 2026-08-10, from reading the three furniture namespaces end to end for the first time. Not #47 (deferred), which is about Meta: and Help: being documented while holding no page — this is about namespaces that hold 89 pages and are not documented. Not #73 either, which asks where one particular project page belongs. Recorded as clean beside it: the Map: namespace, which the table does declare in-character, was read in full and holds zero real-world references across all 35 pages — the frame is kept everywhere it has been stated.
100	2026-08-10	naming	low	Template:Infobox language, the 11 language articles	Every language article shows a field label its own template calls a placeholder. Template:Infobox language renders a row headed Language code, carrying the registry code from Module:Languages — Language code: YCQ-BE on Besoh language, and the same on all eleven language articles, every one of which fills the code field. The template's documentation says what it is: "The code field holds the language's registry code (label "Language code" is a placeholder, to be renamed once an in-universe term is coined)". So the wiki knows the label is temporary, and the note recording that sits in template documentation, where Yezur Wiki:Conventions §Open threads does not put open threads — they are "recorded as plain text on the article's Talk page, under an == Open threads == heading". Checked across every Talk page on the wiki: none mentions it. The five family articles are unaffected — Template:Infobox language family has no such field.	Two answers, and they are independent. (a) The note: move the open thread to a Talk page, so it sits where the convention set puts one and is not lost when the documentation is next rewritten — Talk:List of languages is the natural home, the roster being the page that tabulates the codes, and it does not exist yet, so the title is written unlinked here; the routine can create it as soon as it is told which page. (b) The label: coining the in-universe term is the operator's, and the row stays open until it is coined. Recorded for whenever that happens: the change is one word in one template and reaches all eleven articles at once, because the label is written once and rendered eleven times.	pending	New 2026-08-10. Filed low, not medium: nothing is broken, nothing contradicts, and a code registry is a thing an encyclopedia may plausibly keep about its own languages. What makes it a row rather than nothing is that the template says the label is provisional and nowhere else on the wiki does. Not #37, which is on the to-do list at User talk:Yezur and asks whether reconstructed languages get articles; that row is about the registry's contents, this is about the label on the field that displays them.
101	2026-08-10	structural	low	Category:Hidden categories	A wiki-wide container is filed inside one branch of the wiki it is meant to span. Category:Hidden categories is the tracking category MediaWiki fills automatically: any category carrying __HIDDENCAT__ lands in it without being told to, which is why Category:Auphen errors and Category:Auphen test failures are members although neither page names it, and why the container is a member of itself. Its own description says as much, and is accurate. Its parent is not: its one category link is Category:Dictionary maintenance, a branch whose own description scopes it to "the Yezur Dictionary and the modules that serve it". Today the three hidden categories on the wiki are all Dictionary ones, so nothing is misfiled; the container is. Hide any category outside the Dictionary — a deletion queue, a file backlog, a maintenance list for the map — and it will appear, automatically, inside a Dictionary branch. Of the 37 categories on the wiki this is the only one whose stated scope is wider than its parent's; the other 36 nest inside theirs, and the Category:Ancient cities → Category:Ancient cities in Hertia chain is the worked example Yezur Wiki:Conventions §Categories describes.	One line. Reparent Category:Hidden categories from Category:Dictionary maintenance to Category:Yezur Wiki — which is Category:Dictionary maintenance's own parent, so the container moves up one step and stops being a Dictionary page while the three maintenance categories it holds stay exactly where they are. Nothing else changes and no page's own categories move.	pending	New 2026-08-10, from mapping all 37 categories and their parents for the first time. Recorded as not a finding beside it: the three members sit in both Category:Hidden categories and its ancestor Category:Dictionary maintenance, which the redundant-categorisation check raises — but one of those two is added by hand and the other by the software, so it is a by-product of the tracking mechanism and not a miscategorisation. Also not a finding: Category:Auphen errors and Category:Auphen test failures are the two names on Special:UnusedCategories and both are empty, which is the good state each of them declares in its own description.
102	2026-08-10	markup	low	Template:Desc	The one line of documentation this template has runs the example instead of showing it. Template:Desc's documentation opens "A Descendants-section line: {{desc|YCP-XC|weki}} renders the language's display name … followed by a link to the word, starred for reconstructed languages." The call is wrapped in <code> and not in <nowiki>, so the parser executes it. What the page actually renders is "A Descendants-section line: Proto-Unterian: *weki renders the language's display name …" — the output stands where the syntax should be, and an editor reading the page is never shown how to call the template. The sentence still reads as English, which is why it has gone unnoticed: the substitution is invisible unless the page is rendered and compared to its source. Every other dictionary and link template gets this right — Template:L, Template:M, Template:D, Template:Head, Template:Lb, Template:Etym-missing, Template:Auphen and the four map-link templates all wrap their examples in <nowiki> or a <pre> block, and several then show the live output deliberately, after an arrow. Template:Desc shows only the output.	One line, no wording changed. Wrap the call: {{desc|YCP-XC|weki}} inside <nowiki> tags, as the sibling templates do. If the live rendering is wanted as well — it is a fair demonstration, and the entry it reaches, Dictionary:weki, exists and is correct — follow the house pattern the other templates use and write the escaped syntax, an arrow, then the live call on the same line. Either way it costs no orphan: the live call is one of that entry's two incoming links, and the other, from Dictionary:bʰek, keeps it off Special:LonelyPages whichever way this row is carried out.	pending	New 2026-08-10, and found by rendering rather than by reading, like #90: the wikitext looks ordinary and the rendered sentence is grammatical, so only holding the two side by side shows the swap. Recorded as not a finding beside it: Template:YCQ-BE-conj and Template:YCQ-BE-decl carry a one-line description with no worked example at all, where their Ancient Hertic counterparts show one — but both are called bare, with no arguments, so there is nothing to exemplify. Template:YAQ-HE-decl/core likewise shows none, and says in its own comment that it is not to be placed on entries directly.
103	2026-08-10	structural	low	Template:Head	The wiki's most-used template reads nine parameters, documents seven, and one of the two it leaves out is in live use on 143 entries. Template:Head files every Dictionary entry into Lexemes — 2,737 rows — and its documentation gives a usage block for 1, 2, gloss, register, etym_type and etym_source, plus a definition list for 1, 2 and head. Two more are read and never mentioned. class is passed to Module:Head and, where the module knows the code and part of speech, prints the gender or inflection class inline and files a category for it — it is used on 143 pages, all Ancient Hertic, in seven values (F 36, OO 28, IS 28, M1 20, N1 14, M2 11, N2 6), and it is the parameter behind category names like Category:Ancient Hertic first-declension masculine nouns, which are among the 105 on Special:WantedCategories. notes is both read by the template and declared in its Lexemes schema, and is used by no page at all. The only description of class anywhere is a comment in the Lua source of Module:Head — and that module is one of the seven with no /doc page, so an editor who opens Template:Head to learn how to write an entry cannot find it. The mirror case is worth naming: register is documented and used by no entry, so the doc and the practice have drifted in both directions.	Two lines added to the documentation, and nothing else touched. Add class to the usage block and the definition list — "inflection class, where the language defines one; shows the class inline and files its category (Ancient Hertic: F, M1, M2, N1, N2 for nouns; IS, OO for verbs)" — read off Module:Head's own table, not invented. Add notes beside it, or, if it is not wanted, drop it from the template and from the Lexemes declaration — but that second choice needs the one-time administrative recreate data rebuild Yezur Wiki:Conventions requires for any schema change, so documenting it is much the cheaper answer.	pending	New 2026-08-10. Not a re-opening of #25, the module-documentation item on the to-do list at User talk:Yezur: that is about writing /doc pages for seven modules, this is two lines on a template that already has documentation. The two connect only in that Module:Head's missing /doc is why the Lua comment is the sole record of class. Recorded as not a finding: the five infobox templates were checked the same way and every one documents exactly the parameters it reads — 7 of 7, 15 of 15, 6 of 6, 5 of 5 and 11 of 11 — so this is the one template on the wiki where the two lists differ.
104	2026-08-11	structural	low	Hertia, Khurou, Thiorosirega, Phose Serou	Three of the four cities in Hertia's list link back to the list. Hertia §Notable cities names four, each with its native spelling: Alompe (Αλουμπε), Khurou (Χουρου), Thiorosirega (Θηοροςιρεγα) and Phose Serou (Φοσε Ζερου). Alompe is an article. The other three are redirects, and all three point at Hertia#Notable cities — the very section the reader clicked from, so the link returns them to the line they started on with nothing to say they have not moved. Nothing on the wiki reports this: a redirect to the page that holds the link is neither broken nor double, and Special:BrokenRedirects and Special:DoubleRedirects both read 0. Every wikilink on all 2,622 pages was resolved through the redirect table this run, and these three are the only self-returning links on the wiki. The redirects themselves are not the problem and should stay — they catch the three names from search and from outside — and all three anchors are live: Notable cities is a real heading on Hertia, as are the anchors of the other two anchored redirects.	Two answers, and the wiki has already chosen one of them once. (a) Leave the three names plain in the bullets, keeping the native forms and the redirects — which is exactly what Tacchoan does with its four branch names under dismissed #57, where the operator's ruling was that the names "stay plain in the bullets that define them" until articles exist. Three lines changed, Alompe's bullet untouched, and the routine can do it in one pass. (b) Or write the three as articles on Alompe's model — a sentence or two, the native name, {{On the map}} and Category:Ancient cities in Hertia — which is lexical and geographic content work, not maintenance, and is the operator's to make. The category is the measure of the gap: it holds one member for the four cities the article names.	pending	New 2026-08-11, from the first link-topology check the routine has run — earlier sweeps resolved links against pages that exist, not against where a redirect lands. Not #12 (rejected), which settled that the Greek-letter native spellings on these very lines are deliberate in-world orthography: that row is about what the names look like, this is about where the links go. Not #92 either, although it touches one of the same bullets — that row takes the bold off Fose Serou — but if both are carried out they are one edit on one line. Recorded beside it: all 20 redirects on the wiki are bare one-liners, carrying no category and no text of their own, so nothing else is riding on these three.
105	2026-08-11	structural	low	Sea of Sihia, Unteria, Betonia	Three articles are named by a placeholder, and the note saying so is on somebody else's Talk page. Yezur Wiki:Conventions §Open threads is exact about where such a note goes: unresolved questions and placeholder names "are recorded as plain text on the article's Talk page, under an == Open threads == heading". Three of them have outgrown that. Talk:Andusia carries "'Unteria' is a placeholder, awaiting a Yezuri derivation" and "'Betonia' is a placeholder, awaiting a Yezuri derivation"; Talk:Sihia and Talk:Vetsihia both carry "'Sea of Sihia' is a placeholder, awaiting a Yezuri derivation". But Unteria, Betonia and Sea of Sihia are each an article in their own right now, and not one of the three has a Talk page — so an editor who opens the article whose title is the placeholder finds nothing, and the thread lives only on the pages that mention it in passing. All 32 main-namespace articles were checked against the 19 pages of the Talk: namespace: 12 articles have a Talk page, and these three are the only articles on the wiki that are the subject of a recorded open thread and have none.	Three Talk pages, one line each, copied from where the thread already sits — an == Open threads == heading and the placeholder bullet in the wording Talk:Andusia and Talk:Sihia already use. Nothing new is asserted, no article is edited, and the routine can do it in one pass. Leave the existing notes where they are: Unteria and Betonia are subcontinents of Andusia and the Sea of Sihia is enclosed by Sihia, so those pages have their own reason to carry the thread. This adds a note; it does not move one.	pending	New 2026-08-11, from the first reading of the Talk: namespace since 2026-07-26, before the article and Dictionary work that created these three pages. Not #59 (rejected), which was about these same three articles reaching no Cargo table and finding no infobox to fit a subcontinent, an island or a sea — that question closed with Cargo, and this one is about a Talk-page note. Consistent with #91's reading rather than against it: that row recorded New World as "an open thread on both Talk pages … recorded exactly where the Conventions say an open thread belongs", and it is — New World is not an article, so Talk:Lovvocia and Talk:Vetsia are the article Talk pages it belongs on. These three names have since become articles, and no note followed them.
106	2026-08-11	structural	low	Talk:Alompe, Talk:English language	Two Talk-page threads are still open on questions the operator has already closed, one of them for twenty-five days. Nothing revisits a Talk page when a verdict settles what it records, so all twelve live Talk pages — the 19 in the namespace, less 2 redirects and the 5 queued for deletion under deferred #58 — were read against the flagged-items table and the Dismissed flags list. Ten carry nothing but live questions. Two have drifted. Talk:Alompe says the native spelling Αλουμπε "follows Hertia's current orthography, which is itself under review (routine report, voice flag)" — written 2026-07-17 at 08:18. The review it names is #12, and it closed two days later: on 2026-07-19, in revision 1216 of this page, the operator rejected it — the Greek-letter native names on Hertia, Alompe and the Hertic pages are "fully intentional in-world orthographic style". There is no review, and there has not been one since. Talk:English language opens "The infobox's family field is left empty (isolate) — decide whether the Cargo Languages row should store a queryable value (e.g. "Isolate") instead". There is no Languages row to decide about: the encyclopedia's Cargo was retired on 2026-07-30 (dismissed #43 and #59), Template:Infobox language carries neither a cargo_declare nor a cargo_store, and a query against Languages throws the same MWException as Continents, LanguageFamilies, Polities and FormerCountries — re-verified this run, with Lexemes still the one table that answers.	Two edits, and both close a thread rather than open one. On Talk:Alompe, strike the second bullet, or replace it with the ruling it is waiting for — that the Greek-letter native spellings are settled in-world orthography per #12. Its first bullet stays: the map node recorded "until a settlement infobox exists to hold it" is still live, because no settlement infobox exists. On Talk:English language, strike the first bullet: an empty family field is correct for an isolate and there is no longer a table for it to feed. That page's other two bullets — the registry codes, and the pointer to Talk:Engil — both still hold. Neither edit touches an article.	pending	New 2026-08-11. Not a re-opening of #12, #43 or #59: all three are settled and stay settled, and that is exactly the finding — the settlement never reached the Talk pages that were waiting on it. The other ten check out, including the two that look stale and are not: the placeholder eras of dismissed #8 are still open threads, because the operator's ruling confirmed the names are not canon rather than supplying replacements, and Talk:Engil's two questions are undecided by his own word. Recorded beside it rather than filed: Talk:Engil instructs that {{Infobox polity}} be added once Engil's details are settled, and #74 proposes renaming that template — but #74's fix leaves a redirect behind, so the instruction keeps working whichever way that row goes.
107	2026-08-12	structural	medium	306 Dictionary: entries (Besoh)	The two languages that carry both headings order them opposite ways, and the one that keeps to the wiki's own skeleton is the smaller. Yezur Wiki:Dictionary structure fixes the order inside a language section and states it as a rule — "only the headings that apply, but always in this order and nesting" — with Alternative forms, then Etymology, then Pronunciation, then the part-of-speech heading. Ancient Hertic keeps it: all 212 of its sections put Etymology above Pronunciation, as does the wiki's one Pjany entry. Besoh inverts it, without exception: of its 1,103 sections, 306 carry both headings and all 306 put Pronunciation first — not one Besoh section is written in the documented order. The other 790 Besoh sections carry a pronunciation and no etymology, so the question does not arise in them. Nothing on the wiki records the inversion: Dictionary:About Besoh promises that "each entry's Pronunciation section gives the estimated spoken form" without saying where the section sits, Yezur Wiki:Conventions is silent on entry layout, and the structure page names no exception. The split is by language, not by author or by date — every Besoh section one way, every Hertic section the other, with no mixed page anywhere.	One of the two bodies has to move, and which one is the operator's call. (a) Bring the entries into line — in the 291 sections that carry a single Etymology, move the Pronunciation block below it. The move is as mechanical as an edit gets: all 1,096 Besoh Pronunciation sections are exactly one line, * {{auphen|word|YCQ-BE}}, with nothing else beneath the heading. (b) Bring the skeleton into line — record on Yezur Wiki:Dictionary structure that Pronunciation precedes Etymology, and the 212 Ancient Hertic sections become the deviation instead. (c) Record the order as a per-language choice and neither body moves. The remaining 15 sections are the same case under any ruling: they head their senses Etymology 1 and Etymology 2, where a pronunciation shared by both stands above them for the reason Wiktionary's own layout gives, and they are best left as they are.	pending	New 2026-08-12, from the first heading-structure pass the routine has run over the Dictionary — 2,415 entries, every language section's headings read in sequence and checked against the skeleton. Recorded beside it: two headings in daily use appear nowhere in that skeleton at all — Declension (245 sections) and Conjugation (141) — but their placement is consistent, directly under the part-of-speech heading, so no row is filed for them; the edit that settles this one could name them in passing.
108	2026-08-12	structural	low	42 Dictionary: entries (Proto-Andusian)	Forty-two entries carry a heading the operator's own ruling retired — and they carry it for a relation the ruling does not describe. Yezur Wiki:Dictionary structure records the ruling: one ====Related terms==== heading with labelled bullets "in place of Wiktionary's heading per relation", and it names ====Derived terms==== among the four headings it replaces. The ruling is otherwise kept perfectly: 81 Related terms sections hold 89 bullets, every one of them labelled — Compare: 38, Antonym: 32, Coordinate term: 14, Near-synonym: 4, Derived term: 1 — and there is not one unlabelled bullet in the Dictionary. But 42 Proto-Andusian sections head a list ====Derived terms====, holding 75 bullets, and the two lists are not the same thing: every one of the 75 is a {{desc}} line pointing into a daughter language — Proto-North-Andusian, Proto-South-Andusian, Proto-Unterian — while the one ruled Derived term: bullet, on Dictionary:ka, points at a Proto-Andusian word. The heading is used consistently: all 42 place it immediately before Descendants (41 of them; Dictionary:fiq, which has no Descendants section, ends with it), no bullet repeats a line from the Descendants list beneath it, and all 75 targets exist. Nine of the 42 carry both headings.	Two clean answers, and the routine will not choose between them — the choice states what the Dictionary means by a derived term. (a) Fold and drop — rewrite each bullet as * Derived term: {{desc|…}} beneath the section's Related terms heading, creating that heading where the section has none, and delete the Derived terms heading: 42 edits, after which the ruling holds without exception. (b) Document the heading — add Derived terms to the skeleton on Yezur Wiki:Dictionary structure as the cross-language list, between Related terms and Descendants, which is exactly where all 42 already sit: one page edit, no entry touched.	pending	New 2026-08-12, from the same heading pass as #107. Distinct from #87: that row is about pointers that resolve to nothing, and all 75 of these resolve. A 43rd page carries the heading and is left out of every count above — Dictionary:ɓolo, written unlinked because it is one of the 37 implosive-title pages in the deletion queue under deferred #70: it holds a delete tag, a stray Derived terms heading and one bullet, with no language section at all.
109	2026-08-12	structural	low	Dictionary:fiq	One line is written twice. The Derived terms list of Dictionary:fiq — the Proto-Andusian bound root covering — gives * {{desc|YCP-XC|fofiʔi}} on two consecutive lines, so a two-item list names the same Proto-Unterian word twice and the rendered entry prints Proto-Unterian: fofiʔi one line under the other. It is the only one on the wiki: 2,784 bullets were read across the Dictionary, grouped by the heading each sits under, and this is the single repeated line among them.	Delete the second of the two lines. Nothing else on the page changes.	pending	New 2026-08-12. Independent of #108: the duplicate goes whichever way that row is settled — folded into one labelled bullet under (a), deleted where it stands under (b) — so this row can be approved on its own. Dictionary:fiq is also the one page of the 42 that has no Descendants section, its list of derivatives being all the onward material it carries.
110	2026-08-13	structural	medium	206 Dictionary: entries (Proto-Herta-Olaic), Dictionary:gurə	One job, three notations — and the split is by language family, not by page. Every Descendants list on the wiki was read: 1,271 bullets holding 1,273 links. The Andusian layer writes all 1,064 of its bullets as * {{desc|code|word}}. The Proto-Herta-Olaic layer writes all 206 of its bullets by hand — * Ancient Hertic: {{l|YAQ-HE|word}} — spelling out the language name that Template:Desc reads from Module:Languages. The single Proto-Njeshan bullet, on Dictionary:gurə, uses a third form and a third template: * Pjany: {{d|geúrl|YBS-PJ}}, word first. No page mixes two of them, and the rendered output of all three is identical — test-parsed side by side, the hand-written Hertic bullet and {{desc|YAQ-HE|αμπαν}} emit byte-for-byte the same HTML, section anchor and all. What differs is maintenance, and Template:Desc's own documentation names it: the display name comes from the registry, "so renaming a language is a single registry edit, never a page sweep". Renaming Ancient Hertic today means a 206-page sweep.	207 edits, and not one changes what a reader sees. Replace each hand-written bullet with * {{desc|YAQ-HE|word}}, and Dictionary:gurə's with * {{desc|YBS-PJ|geúrl}}. One page needs a second decision: Dictionary:xmɑtʲe: (Proto-Herta-Olaic, the genderless third person) lists three Ancient Hertic reflexes on one line — * Ancient Hertic: {{l|YAQ-HE|μα}}, {{l|YAQ-HE|εμι}}, {{l|YAQ-HE|του}} — the only Descendants bullet on the wiki naming more than one word; under {{desc}} it becomes three bullets, which is how every other multiple-reflex entry is already written.	pending	New 2026-08-13, from the first reciprocity pass over the Dictionary — see the run notes. Not a rendering fault: nothing is broken today, and the row would be low but for the sweep it stores up. Recorded beside it: accepting the notation makes the Proto-Herta-Olaic layer's bookkeeping perfect — 208 descent claims, 208 descendant links, zero unanswered in either direction, the only layer on the wiki with a clean sheet. If the operator would rather keep the hand-written form, the row closes as rejected and the practice should be written into Yezur Wiki:Dictionary structure, which currently documents neither form.
111	2026-08-13	structural	medium	Dictionary:ɔŋ	A fifth Descendants list left behind by the rope relocation, on the page nobody checked. Dictionary:ɔŋ (Proto-South-Andusian, rope, cord; vine) gives its Besoh descendant as {{desc|YCQ-BE|on}}. Dictionary:on holds no rope sense: it is the adposition at, by, on, inherited from Dictionary:oŋ — a different Proto-South-Andusian etymon, whose own Descendants list names on correctly. The Besoh reflex of rope is one page away and is written: Dictionary:one, glossed rope, cord; vine, liana, whose etymology reads "From on (“rope”, now archaic), extended to escape its homophone, the locative particle." The link is blue, so no maintenance page can see it; it simply lands on the wrong word.	One line. On Dictionary:ɔŋ, change the descendant to * {{desc|YCQ-BE|one}}. Nothing is asserted that Dictionary:one does not already say about itself.	pending	New 2026-08-13. Not a re-opening of #84: that row's Notes record checking Dictionary:oŋ "for the same residue after the rope homograph moved" and finding it correct — and it is correct, because it is the locative etymon. Dictionary:ɔŋ, with the open vowel, is the rope etymon, a separate page, and is the one holding the residue. A second question the operator may want to settle in the same edit, filed here rather than as its own row: Dictionary:one names its source as plain italic on with no {{m}} and no Proto-South-Andusian step, so the chain Dictionary:ɔᵑg → Dictionary:ɔŋ → Dictionary:one is unlinked at its last step from both ends; and the archaic Besoh on the etymology cites is not a sense Dictionary:on carries.
112	2026-08-13	factual	medium	Dictionary:bë, Dictionary:be, Dictionary:gön, Dictionary:gö	Two words say they exist to escape a homophone that is still sitting where they left it. Four entries explain themselves as a form split off to avoid a clash, and two of the four are consistent: Dictionary:mium (hail) fronted "to escape mum (“scratch”)", and Dictionary:mum's Besoh section carries scratch and nothing else; Dictionary:one (rope) extended "to escape its homophone, the locative particle", and Dictionary:on carries the locative and nothing else. The other two are not. Dictionary:bë is glossed right and opens "From Proto-South-Andusian be (“right”), the vowel lengthened to escape its homophones" — while Dictionary:be's Besoh section still carries Etymology 3, an adjective glossed right(-hand); the strong side. Dictionary:gön is glossed spear and opens "From gö (“spear”), extended with -n to escape its homophones" — while Dictionary:gö still carries Etymology 3, a noun glossed spear, lance. Lexemes therefore holds two Besoh adjectives for right and two Besoh nouns for spear. And the ancestors follow the source, not the escape-form: Dictionary:be's Proto-South-Andusian right section lists Besoh be, and Dictionary:goː's spear section lists Besoh gö.	The reading is the operator's; both readings are then mechanical. (a) The escape completed — delete Etymology 3 from Dictionary:be's Besoh section and from Dictionary:gö, and repoint the parents to {{desc|YCQ-BE|bë}} and {{desc|YCQ-BE|gön}}. This is the pattern the wiki already used for kunke → Dictionary:kiunke, where the superseded page was blanked and queued. (b) Both forms stand — keep the older sense, mark it archaic or dialectal on its own entry so the escape sentence stops contradicting it, and list both descendants on each parent.	pending	New 2026-08-13, from the same reciprocity pass as #110. Not a re-opening of #84 or #85: those are links pointing at the wrong page or a sense the parent does not have, and both are answered by editing the parent; this is two live entries on the same language contradicting each other, and no edit to a parent settles it. Invisible to the duplicate test that runs every night: it matches on (word, language, part of speech) and these are two spellings of one sense, which no uniqueness check on the table can see. Not a criticism of either coinage — the escape pattern is well attested here, and the two entries that get it right show exactly what completing it looks like.
113	2026-08-14	factual	medium	10 Dictionary: form entries (Besoh), against Dictionary:mum, Dictionary:mium, Dictionary:on and Dictionary:one	Two of the four homophone escapes of #112 are complete on the lemma page and unfinished one level down: the old word's inflected forms are still on the wiki, still declining a lemma that no longer holds that sense. Dictionary:mium (hail) says it was fronted "to escape {{m|YCQ-BE|mum}} (‘scratch’)", and Dictionary:mum's Besoh section duly carries the verb scratch and nothing else — no noun, and a Conjugation table rather than a Declension one. Beneath it stand five noun-form entries — Dictionary:mumbi, mumon, mumu, mumubi and mumu'on — each reading "…of mum (‘hail’)", a Besoh noun the Dictionary elsewhere denies exists; the five forms of mium are written in full beside them, so the paradigm stands on the wiki twice. Dictionary:one (rope) says the same of itself — extended from on "to escape its homophone, the locative particle" — and five more form entries name on and gloss it "rope": Dictionary:onbi, onon, onu, onubi and onu'on. Dictionary:on is the adposition at, by, on; it holds no rope sense and no table, so a reader following any of the five arrives at the wrong word. The two halves fail differently, because the escape changed only the singular stem. The plural of one is still onu, so onu, onubi and onu'on are the right strings under the wrong name — they are Dictionary:one's own live table cells — while onbi and onon are the archaic singular and are generated by nothing at all, the dative and locative singular of one being onebi and one'on, both written and both correct. No existing check can see any of it: every link involved is blue, the Lexemes duplicate test matches on (word, language, part of speech) and so cannot see two spellings of one sense, and all ten pages pass the 2026-08-12 anchor pass and the 2026-08-13 reciprocity pass alike — neither of which read a non-lemma entry.	Mechanical in both halves, and the routine invents nothing — every judgement below is read off a page that already exists. (a) The three misnamed cells: change {{l|YCQ-BE|on}} to {{l|YCQ-BE|one}} on Dictionary:onu, onubi and onu'on, one word each. The gloss "rope" then matches the lemma it points at, and the three become what Dictionary:one's table already says they are. (b) The five stranded mum forms and the two stranded on singulars: tag them {{delete}} with the reason stated, exactly as the fifty superseded plurals of #81 and the two kiunke respellings already on the queue are tagged. The routine holds no delete right, so tagging is the whole of what it can do, and an administrator clears them with the rest. One of the seven is edited rather than tagged: Dictionary:mumu also carries a Proto-Unterian noun (sea-foam), so only its Besoh section goes and the page stays. The alternative is a claim about Besoh and the routine will not make it — that mum does still hold the noun hail and on the noun rope, in which case the ten entries stand, both lemma pages need the sense restored with a table under it, and Dictionary:mium and Dictionary:one need their escape sentences rewritten.	pending	New 2026-08-14, from the first inflection-reciprocity pass. The ten titles are written unlinked: six of them — mumbi, mumon, mumubi, mumu'on, onbi and onon — are on Special:LonelyPages today, and a link from this Report would take them off it and cost the count its meaning. That those six are lonely is this finding seen from the other side: of the 797 Besoh form entries on the wiki, exactly six have no incoming link, and they are exactly the six that no live table generates. Special:LonelyPages has held that evidence since the routine first read it, and no run had asked it this question. Relation to the rows already on the table: #112 names all four escapes and rules on the two unfinished ones (Dictionary:bë and Dictionary:gön); this row is about the two it called consistent — which they are, on the lemma pages. #111 is the same rope residue in a third place, a Descendants bullet on Dictionary:ɔŋ, and #84 is a fourth. Approving #111 does not touch these five pages, and approving this row does not touch that bullet. Dictionary:bë leaves no residue of this kind, Besoh be being an adjective and taking no table.
114	2026-08-14	structural	medium	Dictionary:hobi, Dictionary:ho'on, Dictionary:hu'on, Dictionary:hummubi, Dictionary:hummu'on	Five non-lemma entries are linked by a live inflection table that they do not acknowledge. Where two Besoh senses inflect into one string the form entry is meant to list both, and across the Dictionary it does: all 59 pages on which a vowel-final noun's locative singular and locative plural collapse into one form state both slots, without exception, and Dictionary:simubi and Dictionary:simu'on carry a line each for sim (wood) and simu (timber), as Dictionary:śimubi and Dictionary:śimu'on do for śim and śimu. Six cells break that rule. Dictionary:ho holds two Besoh nouns — egg under Etymology 1, stone under Etymology 2 — each with its own Declension table. Dictionary:hobi is the dative singular of both and names only egg. Dictionary:ho'on is the locative singular of both, and of Dictionary:ho' (guts) besides, which it does name — and it again omits stone. Dictionary:hu'on is the locative plural of both ho senses and names neither, speaking only for Dictionary:hu' (dog). Dictionary:humme (cloth) is the third instance of the sim/simu shape and the only one left incomplete: its plural is hummu, so its dative and locative plurals are Dictionary:hummubi and Dictionary:hummu'on, and both speak only for Dictionary:hummu (loom). Dictionary:hummu itself was written correctly — its Noun 2 is the plural of humme — so the pattern was begun on that pair and stopped two pages short. What a reader meets: following the dative plural in Dictionary:humme's table lands on a page that says "Dative singular of hummu (‘loom’)", a different word with a different meaning, and following either ho table's locative plural lands on a page about a dog.	Six lines added to five pages, in the wording those pages already use, and nothing removed. On Dictionary:hobi: # Dative singular of {{l|YCQ-BE|ho}} (“stone”). On Dictionary:ho'on: the same for the locative singular of ho (stone), beside the three lines already there. On Dictionary:hu'on: two lines, the locative plural of ho (egg) and of ho (stone). On Dictionary:hummubi: # Dative plural of {{l|YCQ-BE|humme}} (“cloth”). On Dictionary:hummu'on: # Locative plural of {{l|YCQ-BE|humme}} (“cloth”). Nothing new is asserted by any of the six: each is a cell Module:Besoh generates today, from a table already on the page, and each is copied from the shape Dictionary:simubi and Dictionary:simu'on already use for the identical situation. Order within each list follows those two — the shorter lemma first.	pending	New 2026-08-14, from the first inflection-reciprocity pass. The count is a floor, not a guess: the routine rebuilt Module:Besoh's morphology locally and then checked it against the live parser on every one of the 242 lemma headwords that carries a table — 242 of 242 identical, link for link — before comparing anything, so the six cells are proved rather than inferred. Four more cells of the same shape are deliberately not counted here, because #112 decides them: Dictionary:gö's Etymology 3 (spear) has a live Declension table whose dative singular, dative plural and locative singular and plural land on Dictionary:göbi, gö'ubi and gö'on, all three of which speak only for gö (louse). Settle #112 the first way and that table goes, taking the four cells with it; settle it the second way and they want the same four lines this row proposes, which the routine can carry out in the same pass. Beyond these and the ten pages of #113, no entry on the wiki states a slot its table does not generate, and no cell lands anywhere unclaimed — the two rows are the whole of the disagreement.
115	2026-08-15	structural	low	7 Dictionary: entries (Besoh)	Seven Besoh entries are the only ones the Dictionary never says how to pronounce — and the module pronounces all seven. Dictionary:About Besoh opens its account of the sound system with a promise: "The spelling is conservative: Besoh is not pronounced as written. Each entry's Pronunciation section gives the estimated spoken form." Of the language's 1,103 sections, 1,096 keep it. The seven that do not are all bound forms — -ke, -me, -so, -va, bi-, ro-, so'- — which reads as a class exemption until the eighth affix is read. Dictionary:bon- is a Besoh prefix and it does carry one, * {{auphen|bon-|YCQ-BE}}, in the ordinary Besoh position above the etymology. So the Dictionary holds eight Besoh affix entries and pronounces one. The module is not the obstacle, and it was built for exactly this case: test-parsed live, all seven resolve and none files into Category:Auphen errors — and a trailing hyphen visibly suppresses the word-final laws, so bon gives /bõ/ while bon- gives /boŋ-/, which is the law Dictionary:About Besoh states in its own words: "Final n survives only as nasality on the vowel … the [ŋ] returns under suffixation". Module:Auphen already knows what a Besoh affix sounds like; no entry asks it.	Seven one-line insertions, and the line is already written for each. Add to each of the seven a ===Pronunciation=== heading with the single bullet * {{auphen|WORD|YCQ-BE}}, WORD being the entry's own headword, placed above the ===Etymology=== heading, where Dictionary:bon- and every other Besoh entry put it. The routine asserts nothing: the rendered form is whatever the module returns, exactly as on the other 1,096.	pending	New 2026-08-15, from the first pass the routine has made over the pronunciation layer — all 1,309 {{auphen}} calls in the Dictionary read and checked against the section holding them. Stated against the row: of the seven, only so'- would render differently from its spelling (/soʔ-/); the other six come back as written, so six of the seven edits buy consistency rather than information, and that is a fair reason to close this rejected and record the affixes as a deliberate exception on Yezur Wiki:Dictionary structure instead. It does not presume #107: if that row is settled by moving Besoh's Pronunciation below Etymology, these seven should be written in whichever order it fixes, and the same seven edits serve. Not a dormant corner — four of the eight affixes are named from other entries' etymologies (-ke twice, -so three times, -me and bon- once each).
116	2026-08-15	structural	low	105 Dictionary: entries (71 Besoh, 32 Proto-Andusian, 2 Ancient Hertic)	The Dictionary records a word's descent from a foreign parent at both ends, and its formation from a parent in its own language at one end only. Every etymology naming a word in its own language section was read against what that word's page lists back: 144 such formations — Besoh 99, Proto-Andusian 43, Ancient Hertic 2. Three are answered, all three Proto-Andusian and all three by a Related terms bullet: Dictionary:ka names kaka as a Derived term:, Dictionary:bʰek names bʰebʰe and Dictionary:mɔ names moᵑg, both as Compare:. The other 141 are silent in that direction. 108 distinct entries are named as the source of a word formed from them — every one of the 108 is itself an entry on this wiki, with the sense the derivative claims — and 105 of them say nothing back. Besoh is the pattern entire: 99 formations — korso "the runner" from koro "run", vezen "of-cloud" from vez "cloud", bonkoro "far-running" from both — and across all 1,103 Besoh sections there is no Related terms section and no Derived terms section of any kind. The cause is structural, not careless, and #108 is where it surfaces: all 75 Derived terms bullets on the wiki are {{desc}} lines pointing into a daughter language, so the Dictionary has no established home for a formation inside one language — which is why the single page that tried to record one reached for the Derived term: label, used exactly once in the Dictionary.	flag-only, and it waits on #108. That row decides what ====Derived terms==== means; until it does, there is nowhere agreed to put these 141 bullets, and the routine will not invent a section. Once it is settled the addition is mechanical and purely additive — one bullet on each of the 105 silent bases naming the words formed from it, every one read off those words' own etymologies, no prose touched and nothing asserted that the derivative does not already state.	pending	New 2026-08-15, from reading the Dictionary's cross-reference layer in both directions. Distinct from #108: that row is about which heading carries which relation and would be satisfied by renaming headings without one new bullet; this is about the bullets that are absent under any heading. Recorded as not findings, from the same pass: the symmetric relations are perfect — of the 89 Related terms bullets, Antonym 32 of 32, Coordinate term 14 of 14 and Near-synonym 4 of 4 are reciprocated without exception, and only Compare: (38 bullets, 16 mutual) runs one way, which is what a compare-note is; and all 75 cross-language Derived terms bullets are answered by their target's own etymology, 75 of 75.

Dismissed flags

Deferred or rejected findings, kept here so later runs do not re-flag them.

• #8 (deferred) — Wanted history-period pages Yezuri Age of Exploration / Yezuri Middle Ages. Operator: not canon names for these eras; will not create stubs under temporary names.
• #11 (deferred) — Andusian / Tacchoan / Shung-Worrehan member-language queries fall back to the default. A content gap, not a data error; operator: no member languages are in yet, add when ready.
• #12 (rejected) — Greek-letter native names on Hertia / Hertic language / Alompe etc. Operator: fully intentional in-world orthographic style.
• #14 (deferred) — Uncategorised portal front pages and the root Category:Yezur. Operator: accepted, but no decided approach for handling it yet.
• #21 (deferred) — The four wanted Ancient Hertic inflection templates (conj-IS, conj-OO, decl-N1, decl-N2). Operator: "will be fixed when the tables are created — already on my to-do." Confirmed present on the to-do list at User talk:Yezur.
• #30 (rejected) — The one-line User:Yezur page, read as an unfinished sentence. Operator: the line is not unfinished — the city name is written there as , "using a script I have added to the wiki, with characters stored in the PUA … a temporary text intended to be used for testing the PUA font; it is working correctly." Answering the operator's condition for reflagging: the routine can see the characters and reads five PUA codepoints there (U+E067 U+E111 U+E179 U+E179 U+E0EB, the third and fourth identical, so a five-letter name with a doubled letter), which round-trip intact through the API. What it cannot do is read them: no mapping from those codepoints to sounds or letters exists anywhere on the wiki, so the glyphs are legible only to a reader with the font. Not reflagged. If a transliteration table for the script ever lands on-wiki, say so and later runs can check such names instead of skipping them.
• #32 (rejected) — Airananwe and the code name:yas-ai in Map:name's worked example matching no language and no registry code. Operator: "that language will land later. No need right now." Left as written; the routine will not re-open it when the language arrives.
• #33 (deferred) — The two redlinked values Map:place=hamlet and Map:place=suburb in Map:place's settlement table. Real but not now; they remain the only redlinked values in any key page's value table, and both are listed in the new Map:Features index only through their parent key.
• #43 (rejected) — Template:Infobox former country declared and stored into a FormerCountries Cargo table that was never created, so Hertia's structured data went nowhere. Operator: "Cargo tables no longer the go-to." Overtaken by the retirement of Cargo from the encyclopedia (2026-07-30): the declaration and the store have both been removed from the template, so there is no longer a table to create. Confirmed this run — of the six tables the wiki once declared, only Lexemes answers a query; Continents, Languages, LanguageFamilies, Polities and FormerCountries now all throw the same MWException that once distinguished an absent table from an empty one, because all five are now absent. The administrative Create data click this row was waiting on is no longer wanted.
• #59 (rejected) — Betonia, Unteria and Sea of Sihia categorised but reaching no Cargo table, with no infobox on the wiki fitting a subcontinent, an island or a sea. Operator: "No longer relevant since Cargo tables no longer the go-to. Not everything needs to be tabulized." The structured-data half of the finding has been removed by the same ruling, and the infobox question closes with it. Vetsihia's borrowed {{Infobox continent}} is left as it stands: with Cargo gone it is display only, and its type=Geographic region (colloquial) already says what the article is.
• #47 (deferred) — Meta: and Help: documented as live namespaces while holding no page, and the sidebar's Project docs link leading to an empty index. Operator: "scarcely used, but will become hugely useful should the project ever open to others — there is simply nothing yet to meta about on a large scale," and Help: is in the same position; no edits to MediaWiki:Sidebar, Yezur Wiki:Main Page or Yezur Wiki:Conventions. The amendment's own task — check whether any Yezur Wiki: page could move to Meta: — was carried out this run, and its one finding is filed as #73. Standing consequence, recorded rather than re-flagged: the sidebar link every reader sees still leads to an empty index, by decision.
• #50 (rejected) — The unreachable index-only branch in Engine:handle_affix of Module:Auphen, where the ELS ~= guard makes the second branch untestable. Operator: "let's not mess with the module's code." The routine will not re-open it; if an affix rule with an index-only else clause is ever written and silently does nothing, that is this row.
• #53 (deferred) — The OpenStreetMap attribution strip baked into File:Tacchoan-subfamilies.png, and the colour key that gives yellow to two branches. Operator: "the operator will upload a better export in time." The licence question is closed: the map is not OSM-derived — it only uses the OSM software — so no credit is required and the strip can simply go. Part (c), the caption clause, was carried out under #55 this run.
• #57 (deferred) — The four Tacchoan branch names (Esselis, Rumesselis, Kipoa, Usy) and the island Usings named into existence with no article, and linked in the caption but plain in the bullets that define them. Operator: deferred. The five remain the only red links out of Tacchoan; the branch names stay plain in the bullets.
• #58 (deferred) — The five Talk:Family A–Talk:Family E pages queued for deletion since 2026-07-28. Operator: "the operator will get to the deletions in due time." Listed under Deletion queue each run as the task list requires, but not re-flagged.
• #65 (deferred) — Map:Conventions, promised by Map:Main Page's lead and linked from two pages, never written. Operator: deferred. It remains the only red link in the Map: namespace outside dismissed #33.
• #70 (deferred) — The 37 superseded Proto-Andusian entries at implosive titles, queued for deletion by the operator's own ruling of 2026-08-03. Operator: "as #58, the operator will get to the deletions in due time." Listed under Deletion queue each run, not re-flagged.

Latest run

2026-08-15. The eighth empty window running. The wiki was fetched end to end and compared byte for byte against the copy taken on 2026-08-14: 2,621 of the 2,622 pages are identical revision for revision, and the one that is not is this Report, moved by our own post from 6310 to 6311. Recent Changes holds one entry since rcid 6288 and it is that post; the newest content edit anywhere on the wiki is still rcid 6281 of 2026-08-07, eight days ago. Phase 1 was empty for the eleventh run running: no operator verdict has been left since revision 3215 on 2026-08-04, all forty-three rows parsed as pending, nothing was applied and nothing dismissed.

The standing rows were again proved unmoved rather than re-measured. The live checks were run in full and agree with 2026-08-14 in every particular: Lexemes 2,737 rows, 0 missing a key field, 0 pointing at a page that does not exist, 0 half-filled etymologies, word matching title 2,737 times, the same 5 homonym triples, etym_type on 210 rows; wanted categories 105, wanted pages 60, wanted templates 5, uncategorised 8, uncategorised categories 1, uncategorised templates 3, dead-end 112, lonely 206, unused templates 3, unused categories 2, redirects 20, deletion queue 94; linter errors 0, broken redirects 0, double redirects 0, Auphen errors 0, unused and uncategorised images 0. Every family's Members table still matches its languages' infoboxes, and Main Page's continent list still holds all seven.

So the survey read the two layers a lemma page carries that no run has read: how it is pronounced, and what it says about the words beside it. Yesterday went below the lemma, into the 797 inflected forms. This run went sideways. All 1,309 {{auphen}} calls in the Dictionary were read against the section holding them, and all 89 Related terms bullets and 75 Derived terms bullets against the pages they point at, in both directions. Two findings, #115 and #116, both low.

The findings

#115 is a promise the Dictionary keeps 1,096 times out of 1,103. Dictionary:About Besoh says that Besoh is not pronounced as written and that "each entry's Pronunciation section gives the estimated spoken form". Seven entries have no such section, and all seven are affixes — which looks like a rule until Dictionary:bon- is read, a Besoh prefix that carries one. The Dictionary holds eight Besoh affix entries and pronounces one. The module is not what is missing: all seven were test-parsed live, all seven resolve, none files an error — and Module:Auphen turns out to be built for bound forms, since a trailing hyphen suppresses the word-final laws. bon gives /bõ/; bon- gives /boŋ-/. That is Dictionary:About Besoh's own law, "the [ŋ] returns under suffixation", implemented and unused. Six of the seven would render as written, which is stated in the row as the reason to reject it.

#116 is the direction the Dictionary does not write in. A word formed from a foreign parent is recorded at both ends — the descendant names its parent, the parent lists its descendant. A word formed from a parent in its own language is recorded only on the derivative. There are 144 such formations, and three are answered. The other 141 name 108 distinct bases, every one of them a real entry carrying the sense claimed, and 105 of those bases say nothing back. Besoh shows it whole: 99 formations, and in 1,103 sections not one Related terms or Derived terms section of any kind. The cause is the gap #108 describes — all 75 Derived terms bullets on the wiki point into a daughter language, so there is no agreed home for a formation inside one language, which is why the one page that recorded such a formation invented a label used exactly once. The row is flag-only and waits on #108.

What came back clean

The descent graph is now closed in both directions, and every disagreement in it is already on this table. 1,273 descendant links and 1,722 etymology references were resolved against each other. Reading down — a parent naming a descendant that does not name it back — gives 38, and they are not new: 36 are the affix pointers of #87, one is #84 and one is #111. Reading up — an etymology naming a parent that does not list it back — leaves, after crediting Derived terms and the deep-root step, a residue of exactly six, and those six are #84 (four), #85 (one) and #112 (one). Nothing else fails in either direction. The 263 Besoh entries that name Proto-Andusian without appearing in its Descendants list are correct: 257 of them name Proto-South-Andusian as well, and the root properly lists only its three immediate daughters.

The relation layer is perfect where it must be. Of the 89 Related terms bullets, every one carrying a symmetric label is symmetric — Antonym 32 of 32, Coordinate term 14 of 14, Near-synonym 4 of 4 — with no exception anywhere. Only Compare: runs one way, 38 bullets of which 16 are mutual, which is what a compare-note is and not a fault. All 75 cross-language Derived terms bullets are answered by their target's own etymology, 75 of 75. The pronunciation layer is exact: all 1,309 {{auphen}} calls take the same two arguments, every one names the language of the section it sits in, and every one names that section's own headword — 1,309 of 1,309, no stale word left behind by a rename.

A corroboration of #87 arrived from the far side. Six Besoh entries cite Proto-Andusian without linking a Proto-South-Andusian step, and they are six of the seven affixes of #115. They are not careless: five of them name the intermediate in plain italics — "through Proto-South-Andusian -kɛ" and its like — and in every one of those five the Proto-South-Andusian entry does not exist, because it is one of the entries #87 says was never written. The seventh, Dictionary:ro-, correctly names no ancestor at all, being a Besoh-internal grammaticalization — and is thereby one of the 99 formations of #116. The two rows filed today and the row filed on 2026-08-07 are three views of one gap.

What is pending

45 rows, #72 to #116. #82 is the only high. Medium: #72 #79 #80 #83 #84 #85 #88 #89 #90 #91 #95 #99 #107 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114. The rest, including both filed today, are low.

Eleven rows now need nothing but a yes — #98 #101 #102 #104 #105 #106 #109 #111 #114 #115 #116 — though the last of those cannot be carried out until #108 is settled. One decision still closes four: #112 settles Dictionary:gö and Dictionary:bë, releases the four cells held back in #114, and tells the routine whether #113 reads the same way. Hertia alone closes four: #91 #92 #96 #104. Three rows need a name and nothing else: #77 a category for the Dictionary appendix pages, #97 a category for the modules, #99 three lines in a table. #110 is still the largest single edit on the table and the least risky: 207 pages, no rendered output changed. #82 should still be answered before #81. #72 has now missed eleven chances to be cheap.