Jump to content

Dictionary:About Proto-Andusian

From Yezur Wiki

This page documents the dictionary's practice for Proto-Andusian (code YCP-XX), the reconstructed common ancestor of the Andusian language family. Being a reconstructed language, none of its forms are attested in writing; every entry is an inference, and the conventions below say how that uncertainty is written down.

Entry conventions

  • Entries live at plain phonemic titles with no asterisk — the leading * that marks a reconstruction is supplied automatically wherever a form is displayed, by the language registry.
  • Definitions are deliberately broad. A reconstructed word is a field of related senses rather than a point: the figurative senses record the extensions the word plausibly carried, and descendant vocabularies may each continue a different part of the field.
  • Derived and compound words whose formation is still transparent carry an Etymology section pointing at their parts. A descendant language may inherit such a word whole (with sound change applied to the fossil), or coin it afresh from the inherited parts — the two routes give different results, and neither is more correct.

Phonology

The reconstructed inventory, as it stands in the core vocabulary:

Consonants
Plain stops p t d b k g q ɢ c ɟ
Voiced aspirates bʰ dʰ
Prenasalized ᵐb ᵑg
Labiovelars kp gb
Affricates ts dz
Fricatives f v s z x ɣ h
Nasals m ɲ ŋ
Liquids and glide r l w

Seven vowels: a e i o u ɛ ɔ. Vowel sequences occur freely (ᵑgao, gɔɛ, zae).

Two gaps appear systematic rather than accidental:

  • There is no plain *n — the nasal series is m, ɲ, ŋ only, matching the prenasalized series (ᵐb, ᵑg, never ⁿd). Descendants that show an n will have innovated it.
  • *p never begins a word, though it is common elsewhere (rop, qup, sorpe).

Derivation

Proto-Andusian word-building is suffixing, with two prefixes. The reconstructed affixes, each with its own entry:

Affix Forms Grounded in
*-uɣ collectives: a mass or landscape of the base ciᵐbuɣ “forest”
*-me result and patient nouns vutme “name”
*-so agent nouns soc “the begetter”
*-ᵐbu instrument nouns ᵐbu “hand”
*-oŋ place nouns “at”
*-dzi diminutives dziq “small”
*-gɛ augmentatives axgɛɣ “big”
*-ɛts abstract nouns ɛts “seed”
*-wa stative adjectives dʰixwa “full”
*-kɛ inchoative verbs “come, become”
*ᵐbi- causatives and benefactives ᵐbi “give”
*sog- privatives sog “not”

One bound root is reconstructed: *fiq “covering”, attested only in ciᵐbfiq “bark” and abʰfiq “skin” (and possibly hiding in fi “sky”).

Reduplication

Three reduplication patterns are reconstructed; the third is productive.

  1. Nursery reduplication in kinship terms: kaka “grandfather” beside ka “father”; bʰebʰe “grandmother” beside bʰek “woman”. Frozen; not productive.
  2. Expressive reduplication in imitative and affective words: ɲiɲi “mosquito”. Marginal.
  3. Full reduplication as a live process: on verbs it is intensive–iterative (dzus-dzus “gnaw, keep biting”, from dzus “bite, eat”), and on nouns plausibly distributive (“here and there, of every kind”). Reduplicated forms are predictable and are not given their own entries; descendant languages may lexicalize individual ones.

Descendant branches

Proto-Andusian gave rise to three branches, each with a reconstructed ancestor of its own and its own practice page: Proto-North-Andusian (YCP-XA), Proto-South-Andusian (YCP-XB), and Proto-Unterian (YCP-XC). Each branch page states the ordered sound laws by which its forms derive from the entries here. The branches part ways instructively: for bʰek “woman” compare North bɛk, South heʔ, Unterian weki.

See also